Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29552548›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2018

Effect of Tactile Stimulation on Termination and Prevention of Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review.

Sophie J E Cramer, Janneke Dekker, Jenny Dankelman, Steffen C Pauws, Stuart B Hooper, Arjan B Te Pas

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04528030 (WAVE Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04528030 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

WAVE Trial in Premature Infants With Apnea of Prematurity Using a Simple, Non-invasive Vibratory Device to Study the Effectiveness in Supporting Breathing and General Stability

TypeinterventionalSponsorInspiration HealthcareRan2021 to 2022Enrolled17ConditionsApnea of Newborn, Hypoxia Neonatal, Bradycardia NeonatalArmsWAVE device
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The effect of sensory stimulation on apnea of prematurity.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Immature control of breathing and apnea of prematurity: the known and unknown.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sophie J E CramerDepartment of Instrumental Affairs, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Janneke DekkerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jenny DankelmanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands.
Steffen C PauwsTilburg center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
Stuart B HooperThe Ritchie Center, MIMR-PHI Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Arjan B Te PasDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLDelft University of Technology · NLHudson Institute of Medical Research · AUTilburg University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apnea of prematurity (AOP) is one of the most common diagnoses in preterm infants. Severe and recurrent apneas are associated with cerebral injury and adverse neurodevelopmental outcome. Despite pharmacotherapy and respiratory support to prevent apneas, a proportion of infants continue to have apneas and often need tactile stimulation, mask, and bag ventilation and/or extra oxygen. The duration of the apnea and the concomitant hypoxia and bradycardia depends on the response time of the nurse. We systematically reviewed the literature with the aim of providing an overview of what is known about the effect of manual and mechanical tactile stimulation on AOP. Tactile stimulation, manual or mechanical, has been shown to shorten the duration of apnea, hypoxia, and or bradycardia or even prevent an apnea. Automated stimulation, using closed-loop pulsating or vibrating systems, has been shown to be effective in terminating apneas, but data are scarce. Several studies used continuous mechanical stimulation, with pulsating, vibrating, or oscillating stimuli, to prevent apneas, but the reported effect varied. More studies are needed to confirm whether automated stimulation using a closed loop is more effective than manual stimulation, how and where the automated stimulation should be performed and the potential side effects.

Indexed as

apneaapnea of prematuritybreathingpreterm infantstactile stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29552548
PMCPMC5840648
OpenAlexW2790285583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.