Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29552518›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized surgery2018

Treatment of pulmonary nodule: from VATS to RATS.

Federico Davini, Sara Ricciardi, Carmelina Cristina Zirafa, Ilenia Cavaliere, Gaetano Romano, Franca Melfi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Federico DaviniCenter of Surgery Robotic and Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Sara RicciardiUnit of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Carmelina Cristina ZirafaCenter of Surgery Robotic and Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Ilenia CavaliereUnit of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gaetano RomanoUnit of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Franca MelfiCenter of Surgery Robotic and Minimally Invasive Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidental detection of solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) is currently increasing due to the widespread use of computed tomography (CT) during the follow up in oncological patients or in screening trials. A quick and definitive histological diagnosis of these nodes is mandatory as, in case of primitive lung cancer, an early detection could improve both surgical results and prognosis. The minimally invasive pulmonary resection (MIPR) is the gold standard procedure for diagnosis and treatment of small lung nodules, but it can be difficult to localize deep nonpalpable nodes that lie in the lung parenchyma. Hence, throughout the years several techniques have been developed to better localize deep or sub solid nodes. We describe our experience with radio-guided technique.

methodsPatients with SPN smaller than 10 mm and/or with a distance from the visceral pleura equal or larger than 10 mm underwent MIPR after CT injection of a solution containing 0.2 mL

resultsBetween 2010 and 2015, 175 patients (M/F: 97/78) underwent minimally invasive resection (thoracoscopic or robotic) with radio-guided technique. The mean node diameter was 13 mm (range, 5-20 mm), and the mean distance from the visceral pleura was 15 mm (range, 6-39 mm). No significant CT-guided-injection-related complications occurred, except for 13 patients (7.4%) who developed a pneumothorax (PNX) not requiring chest tube insertion. This technique guaranteed a successfully intra-operative node localization in 100% of cases. The mean duration of the surgical procedure was 44 min (range, 25-130 min). The mean length of pleural drainage and mean hospital stay was 2.6 days (range, 1-5 days) and 3.9 days (range, 1-7 days) respectively. No mortality or perioperative complications occurred. Pathology reports showed 105 metastases, 55 primitive lung cancers and 15 benign lesions. In case of suspicion of primitive lung tumour an intraoperative frozen exam was conducted, and all patients underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy with lymphadenectomy [41 patients with thoracotomy, 11 with robotic surgery and 3 with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)].

conclusionsOur experience confirms that radio-guided thoracoscopic surgery (RGTS) is a feasible and safe procedure, thanks to its high success rate the radio-guided technique is helpful to overcome the lack of tactile feedback during MIPR [VATS and robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS)] and to limit conversion to open surgery.

Indexed as

minimally invasiveradio-guided surgeryrobotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS)Solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN)video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)

Identifiers

PMID29552518
PMCPMC5847843
OpenAlexW2791122859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.