Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29552420›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Automatic interstitial photodynamic therapy planning via convex optimization.

Abdul-Amir Yassine, William Kingsford, Yiwen Xu, Jeffrey Cassidy, Lothar Lilge, Vaughn Betz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. A Monte Carlo simulation for Moving Light Source in Intracavity PDT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Abdul-Amir YassineEdward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King's College Rd, Toronto, ON M5S3G8, Canada.
William KingsfordDivision of Engineering Science, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto, ON M5S1A1, Canada.
Yiwen XuDepartment of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, 1980 Mathematics Road, Vancouver, BC V6T1Z2, Canada.
Jeffrey CassidyEdward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King's College Rd, Toronto, ON M5S3G8, Canada.
Lothar LilgePrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto Medical Discovery Tower, 101 College Street, Toronto, ON M5G1L7, Canada.
Vaughn BetzEdward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King's College Rd, Toronto, ON M5S3G8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Finding a high-quality treatment plan is an essential, yet difficult, stage of Photodynamic therapy (PDT) as it will determine the therapeutic efficacy in eradicating malignant tumors. A high-quality plan is patient-specific, and provides clinicians with the number of fiber-based spherical diffusers, their powers, and their interstitial locations to deliver the required light dose to destroy the tumor while minimizing the damage to surrounding healthy tissues. In this work, we propose a general convex light source power allocation algorithm that, given light source locations, guarantees optimality of the resulting solution in minimizing the over/under-dosage of volumes of interest. Furthermore, we provide an efficient framework for source selection with concomitant power reallocation to achieve treatment plans with a clinically feasible number of sources and comparable quality. We demonstrate our algorithms on virtual test cases that model glioblastoma multiforme tumors, and evaluate the performance of four different photosensitizers with different activation wavelengths and specific tissue uptake ratios. Results show an average reduction of the damage to organs-at-risk (OAR) by 29% to 31% with comparable runtime to existing power allocation techniques.

Indexed as

(170.1610) Clinical applications(170.3660) Light propagation in tissues(170.5180) Photodynamic therapy

Identifiers

PMID29552420
PMCPMC5854086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.