Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29552399›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2018

Real-time halo correction in phase contrast imaging.

Mikhail E Kandel, Michael Fanous, Catherine Best-Popescu, Gabriel Popescu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quantitative phase microscopies: accuracy comparison.Light, science & applications · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reproductive outcomes predicted by phase imaging with computational specificity of spermatozoon ultrastructure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  12. High-speed interferometric imaging reveals dynamics of neuronal deformation during the action potential.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Diffusion Mapping of Eosinophil-Activation State.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mikhail E KandelDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 306 N. Wright Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Michael FanousDepartment of Bioengineering, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 306 N. Wright Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Catherine Best-PopescuDepartment of Bioengineering, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 306 N. Wright Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Gabriel PopescuDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 306 N. Wright Street, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a label-free, nondestructive method, phase contrast is by far the most popular microscopy technique for routine inspection of cell cultures. However, features of interest such as extensions near cell bodies are often obscured by a glow, which came to be known as the

Indexed as

(030.1670) Coherent optical effects(170.3010) Image reconstruction techniques(999.9999) Quantitative phase imaging

Identifiers

PMID29552399
PMCPMC5854064
OpenAlexW2772796218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.