ArticleJournal of infection prevention2018
An evaluation of infection control in private and public sector intensive care units in South Africa.
Article in Journal of infection prevention, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Implementation strategies for infection prevention and control promotion for nurses in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2019Pooled it
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAppropriate infection control policies and practices are key to reducing the risk of healthcare-associated infections in patients in intensive care units (ICUs).
objectiveTo evaluate infection control in ICUs using the Infection Control Assessment Tool (ICAT).
methodsSix public and five private adult ICUs were included. Seven modules from the ICAT were administered including ICU, hand hygiene, and isolation and standard precautions. Modules were scored on a quantitative scale as per the tool guidelines and trained independent nurses observed practices.
resultsAll ICUs reported to have a 1:1 nurse-to-patient ratio. One public ICU did not have the required 1:2 hand wash basin-to-bed ratio. We observed 100% adherence to handwashing or alcohol rub at each of the five moments of hand hygiene; however, the correct amount of alcohol rub was used in only 2% (n = 2) of the 117 observations. The median score for isolation and standard precautions was 79%. DISCUSSION: There was good infection control practice in ICUs. However, ICUs did not have isolation policies for all the infections listed in the ICAT and did not screen visitors to the ICU. We identified shortcomings in the ICAT and a more suitable tool is required for our healthcare setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.