Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29552025›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2018

New Insights on Water Buffalo Genomic Diversity and Post-Domestication Migration Routes From Medium Density SNP Chip Data.

Licia Colli, Marco Milanesi, Elia Vajana, Daniela Iamartino, Lorenzo Bomba, Francesco Puglisi, Marcello Del Corvo, Ezequiel L Nicolazzi, Sahar S E Ahmed, Jesus R V Herrera and 38 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First Molecular Identification ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

48 authors.

Licia ColliDipartimento di Scienze Animali, della Nutrizione e degli Alimenti, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Marco MilanesiDipartimento di Scienze Animali, della Nutrizione e degli Alimenti, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Elia VajanaDipartimento di Scienze Animali, della Nutrizione e degli Alimenti, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Daniela IamartinoPTP Science Park, Lodi, Italy.
Lorenzo BombaDipartimento di Scienze Animali, della Nutrizione e degli Alimenti, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Francesco PuglisiDipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Biotecnologiche e Traslazionali, Università degli Studi di Parma, Parma, Italy.
Marcello Del CorvoDipartimento di Scienze Animali, della Nutrizione e degli Alimenti, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.
Ezequiel L NicolazziPTP Science Park, Lodi, Italy.
Sahar S E AhmedCell Biology Department, Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology Research Division, National Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Jesus R V HerreraPhilippine Carabao Centre, Nueva Ecija, Philippines.
Libertado CruzPhilippine Carabao Centre, Nueva Ecija, Philippines.
Shujun ZhangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Aixin LiangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Guohua HuaKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Liguo YangKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Xingjie HaoKey Laboratory of Agricultural Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China.
Fuyuan ZuoDepartment of Animal Husbandry, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Song-Jia LaiInstitute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China.
Shuilian WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, China.
Ruyu LiuCollege of Animal Science, Guizhou University, Guiyang, China.
Yundeng GongEnshi Technology College, Enshi, China.
Mahdi MokhberDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agricultural Science, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
Yongjiang MaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Feng GuanCollege of Life Science, China Jiliang University, Hangzhou, China.
Augustin VlaicDepartment of Animal Genetics, Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Bogdan VlaicDepartment of Animal Genetics, Faculty of Animal Science and Biotechnologies, University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Cluj Napoca, Romania.
Luigi RamunnoDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Gianfranco CosenzaDepartment of Agriculture, University of Naples Federico II, Portici, Italy.
Ali AhmadCOMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Sahiwal, Pakistan.
Ihsan SoysalDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey.
Emel Ö ÜnalDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Namik Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey.
Mariena Ketudat-CairnsSchool of Biotechnology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
José F GarciaDepartment of Support, Production and Animal Health, School of Veterinary Medicine, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, Brazil.
Yuri T UtsunomiyaInternational Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Colaborating Centre on Animal Genomics and Bioinformatics, Araçatuba, Brazil.
Pietro S BaruselliFaculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria E J AmaralInstituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista, São José do Rio Preto, Brazil.
Rangsun ParnpaiSchool of Biotechnology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
Marcela G DrummondR&D Department, Myleus, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Peter GalbuseraCentre for Research and Conservation, Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
James BurtonIUCN SSC Asian Wild Cattle Specialist Group and Chester Zoo, Upton by Chester, United Kingdom.
Eileen HoalNRF/DST Centre of Excellence for Biomedical TB Research, MRC Centre for TB Research, and Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, South Africa.
Yulnawati YusnizarResearch Centre for Biotechnology, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Jalan Raya, Indonesia.
Cece SumantriDepartment of Animal Production and Technology, Bogor Agricultural University (IPB), Bogor, Indonesia.
Bianca MoioliConsiglio per la Ricerca in Agricoltura e l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria, Monterotondo, Italy.
Alessio ValentiniDipartimento per l'Innovazione nei Sistemi Biologici, Agroalimentari e Forestali, DIBAF, Università della Tuscia, Viterbo, Italy.
Alessandra StellaPTP Science Park, Lodi, Italy.
John L WilliamsThe Davies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Adelaide, Roseworthy, SA, Australia.
Paolo Ajmone-MarsanDipartimento di Scienze Animali, della Nutrizione e degli Alimenti, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The domestic water buffalo is native to the Asian continent but through historical migrations and recent importations, nowadays has a worldwide distribution. The two types of water buffalo, i.e., river and swamp, display distinct morphological and behavioral traits, different karyotypes and also have different purposes and geographical distributions. River buffaloes from Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Egypt, Romania, Bulgaria, Italy, Mozambique, Brazil and Colombia, and swamp buffaloes from China, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia and Brazil were genotyped with a species-specific medium-density 90K SNP panel. We estimated the levels of molecular diversity and described population structure, which revealed historical relationships between populations and migration events. Three distinct gene pools were identified in pure river as well as in pure swamp buffalo populations. Genomic admixture was seen in the Philippines and in Brazil, resulting from importations of animals for breed improvement. Our results were largely consistent with previous archeological, historical and molecular-based evidence for two independent domestication events for river- and swamp-type buffaloes, which occurred in the Indo-Pakistani region and close to the China/Indochina border, respectively. Based on a geographical analysis of the distribution of diversity, our evidence also indicated that the water buffalo spread out of the domestication centers followed two major divergent migration directions: river buffaloes migrated west from the Indian sub-continent while swamp buffaloes migrated from northern Indochina via an east-south-eastern route. These data suggest that the current distribution of water buffalo diversity has been shaped by the combined effects of multiple migration events occurred at different stages of the post-domestication history of the species.

Indexed as

Bubalus bubalisdomesticationevolutionary historygenomic diversityriver buffaloSNPswamp buffalo

Identifiers

PMID29552025
PMCPMC5841121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.