Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29551414›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2018

Accuracy of Rats in Discriminating Visual Objects Is Explained by the Complexity of Their Perceptual Strategy.

Vladimir Djurdjevic, Alessio Ansuini, Daniele Bertolini, Jakob H Macke, Davide Zoccolan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Efficient processing of natural scenes in visual cortex.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Nonlinear Processing of Shape Information in Rat Lateral Extrastriate Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vladimir DjurdjevicVisual Neuroscience Lab, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy.
Alessio AnsuiniVisual Neuroscience Lab, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy.
Daniele BertoliniVisual Neuroscience Lab, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy.
Jakob H MackeNeural Systems Analysis, Research Center Caesar, an associate of the Max Planck Society, Bonn, Germany; Centre for Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
Davide ZoccolanVisual Neuroscience Lab, International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste 34136, Italy. Electronic address: zoccolan@sissa.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their growing popularity as models of visual functions, it remains unclear whether rodents are capable of deploying advanced shape-processing strategies when engaged in visual object recognition. In rats, for instance, pattern vision has been reported to range from mere detection of overall object luminance to view-invariant processing of discriminative shape features. Here we sought to clarify how refined object vision is in rodents, and how variable the complexity of their visual processing strategy is across individuals. To this aim, we measured how well rats could discriminate a reference object from 11 distractors, which spanned a spectrum of image-level similarity to the reference. We also presented the animals with random variations of the reference, and processed their responses to these stimuli to derive subject-specific models of rat perceptual choices. Our models successfully captured the highly variable discrimination performance observed across subjects and object conditions. In particular, they revealed that the animals that succeeded with the most challenging distractors were those that integrated the wider variety of discriminative features into their perceptual strategies. Critically, these strategies were largely preserved when the rats were required to discriminate outlined and scaled versions of the stimuli, thus showing that rat object vision can be characterized as a transformation-tolerant, feature-based filtering process. Overall, these findings indicate that rats are capable of advanced processing of shape information, and point to the rodents as powerful models for investigating the neuronal underpinnings of visual object recognition and other high-level visual functions.

Indexed as

Reaction TimeAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDiscrimination, PsychologicalForm PerceptionMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationRatsRats, Long-EvansRecognition, PsychologyVisual PathwaysVisual Perceptionclassificationfilteringimageobjectperceptionprocessingrecognitionrodentshapevision

Identifiers

PMID29551414
PMCPMC5887110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.