Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29551401›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2018

Leveraging delay discounting for health: Can time delays influence food choice?

Bradley M Appelhans, Simone A French, Tamara Olinger, Michael Bogucki, Imke Janssen, Elizabeth F Avery-Mamer, Lisa M Powell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02359916 (Time Over Money? A Novel System to Influence Snack Machine Choices), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02359916 completednot on this map

Time Over Money? A Novel System to Influence Snack Machine Choices

TypeobservationalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2015 to 2016Enrolled32,662ConditionsFood ChoiceArmsTime delays on delivery of less healthy snacks, 25%/$0.25 discount on healthy snacks, 25%/$0.25 tax on less healthy snacks
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bradley M AppelhansDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1700 W. Van Buren St., Suite 470, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA; Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, 1645 W. Jackson Blvd., Suite 400, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA. Electronic address: brad_appelhans@rush.edu.
Simone A FrenchDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, 1300 S 2nd Street, Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA.
Tamara OlingerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1700 W. Van Buren St., Suite 470, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Michael BoguckiArcanus Laboratories, Inc., Skokie, IL, 60076, USA.
Imke JanssenDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1700 W. Van Buren St., Suite 470, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Elizabeth F Avery-MamerDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, 1700 W. Van Buren St., Suite 470, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.
Lisa M PowellHealth Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, MC 923, 1603 W Taylor St, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA.

Funding

Time over money? A novel system to influence snack machine choices.R21HL121861 · NHLBI · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI APPELHANS, BRADLEY M. · 2014 to 2015
$430k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL121861
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delay discounting, the tendency to choose smaller immediate rewards over larger delayed rewards, is theorized to promote consumption of immediately rewarding but unhealthy foods at the expense of long-term weight maintenance and nutritional health. An untested implication of delay discounting models of decision-making is that selectively delaying access to less healthy foods may promote selection of healthier (immediately available) alternatives, even if they may be less desirable. The current study tested this hypothesis by measuring healthy versus regular vending machine snack purchasing before and during the implementation of a 25-s time delay on the delivery of regular snacks. Purchasing was also examined under a $0.25 discount on healthy snacks, a $0.25 tax on regular snacks, and the combination of both pricing interventions with the 25-s time delay. Across 32,019 vending sales from three separate vending locations, the 25-s time delay increased healthy snack purchasing from 40.1% to 42.5%, which was comparable to the impact of a $0.25 discount (43.0%). Combining the delay and the discount had a roughly additive effect (46.0%). However, the strongest effects were seen under the $0.25 tax on regular snacks (53.7%) and the combination of the delay and the tax (50.2%). Intervention effects varied substantially between vending locations. Importantly, time delays did not harm overall vending sales or revenue, which is relevant to the real-world feasibility of this intervention. More investigation is needed to better understand how the impact of time delays on food choice varies across populations, evaluate the effects of time delays on beverage vending choices, and extend this approach to food choices in contexts other than vending machines.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02359916.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorDelay DiscountingTime FactorsAdultCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleFood Dispensers, AutomaticFood PreferencesHumansMaleNutritive ValuePilot ProjectsSnacksBehavioral economicsDelay discountingFood choicePricing interventionsVending machines

Identifiers

PMID29551401
PMCPMC5971135

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.