ArticleInternational orthopaedics2018
Association of pre-treatment radiographic characteristics of calcaneal fractures on patient-reported outcomes.
Article in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do calcaneal angles on lateral radiographs predict outcome following intra-articular calcaneal fractures?Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis and functional results of calcaneal fractures treated by an intramedullary nail.International orthopaedics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesCalcaneal fractures are known to influence patients' quality of life negatively. The type of calcaneal fracture might have a relation with the patient outcome. To inform patients in an early stage on how their calcaneal fracture may affect their lives, knowledge of the fracture characteristics is necessary. This study evaluates the association of type of calcaneal fracture, measurement of conventional radiograph angles, and the Sanders classification with patient-reported outcomes. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis is a retrospective study based on a prospective trauma database including all patients aged 16 years or older with a calcaneal fracture admitted in one of the participating trauma level I or II hospitals. Patients, trauma, and fracture characteristics were collected. The conventional radiographs were evaluated in which type of fracture, and Böhler's, Gissane's, and calcaneal compression angles were determined. Also, the CT images were classified according to Sanders. In addition, displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures were separately analyzed. A questionnaire was sent to the included patients that consisted of the EQ-6D, patient-specific characteristics, satisfaction with foot appearance and wearable shoe range, complications, and capability to work.
resultsA total of 396 patients with 442 calcaneal fractures were eligible for follow-up. Two hundred fifteen patients with 246 calcaneal fractures participated. Patients with a calcaneal fracture into the talar surface reported a worse quality of life (p = 0.010), were less satisfied with their feet (p < 0.001), and had more complications (p = 0.001-0.006); extra-articular fractures had significantly opposite result. A negative Böhler's or calcaneal compression angle was related with unfavourable outcomes. Sanders classification was not related with any patient-reported outcome.
conclusionOur study implies that patients with an intra-articular calcaneal fracture into the talar surface have a lower health-related quality of life, will be less satisfied with the outcome of their feet, and have more complications compared to patients with other type of calcaneal fractures. Furthermore, the Sanders classification was not associated with the patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29550913What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.