ReviewPediatric radiology2018
Non-sedation of the neonate for radiologic procedures.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- State-of-the-art review of lung imaging in cystic fibrosis with recommendations for pulmonologists and radiologists from the "iMAging managEment of cySTic fibROsis" (MAESTRO) consortium.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022Pooled it
- [Application of vacuum stretcher combined with feeding in cranial magnetic resonance imaging examination for neonates: a prospective randomized controlled study].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020Trial
- A quality improvement project to reduce magnetic resonance imaging sedation in children.Pediatric radiology · 2025Article
- Sedation-free pediatric [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Sedation and anesthesia for imaging of the infant and neonate-a brief review.Pediatric radiology · 2024Review
- Intelligent ultrafast total-body PET for sedation-free pediatric [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Article
- Utilization of neonatal sedation and anesthesia: an SPR survey.Pediatric radiology · 2022Article
- Assessing and conveying risks and benefits of imaging in neonates using ionizing radiation and sedation/anesthesia.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Expert consensus on the clinical practice of neonatal brain magnetic resonance imaging.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022Article
- Peaceful End of Life in an Unviable Newborn: A Case Report.Indian journal of palliative careArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
On Dec. 16, 2016, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a warning regarding the potential neurotoxicity of anesthesia and sedation agents on the developing brain in children younger than 3 years and in women during their 3rd trimester of pregnancy. These concerns have relevance to the pediatric radiologist who must take into consideration how the child's state might impact image quality. In this review the author provides background on the special concerns in the potentially highest-risk group, pre-term and term neonates, and provides guidance and rationale for the avoidance of sedation in procedural imaging of the newborn.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.