Observational studyPediatric radiology2018
How accurate are prenatal tractography results? A postnatal in vivo follow-up study using diffusion tensor imaging.
Observational study in Pediatric radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Methodological considerations on diffusion MRI tractography in infants aged 0-2 years: a scoping review.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Prenatal assessment of brain malformations on neuroimaging: an expert panel review.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Assessing the Agreement Between Diffusion Tension Imaging (DTI) and T2-Weighted MRI Sequence for Biometry of the Fetal Corpus Callosum.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Anatomically constrained tractography of the fetal brain.NeuroImage · 2024Article
- Characterizing microstructural development in the fetal brain using diffusion MRI from 23 to 36 weeks of gestation.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Single-direction diffusion-weighted imaging may be a simple complementary sequence for evaluating fetal corpus callosum.European radiology · 2022Article
- Feasibility and Added Value of Fetal DTI Tractography in the Evaluation of an Isolated Short Corpus Callosum: Preliminary Results.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2022Article
- Fetal thick corpus callosum: new insights from neuroimaging and neuropathology in two cases and literature review.Neuroradiology · 2021Review
- Corpus Callosum Agenesis: An Insight into the Etiology and Spectrum of Symptoms.Brain sciences · 2020Review
- In vivo characterization of emerging white matter microstructure in the fetal brain in the third trimester.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Development of Brain Networks In Utero: Relevance for Common Neural Disorders.Biological psychiatry · 2020Review
- Automatic, Age Consistent Reconstruction of the Corpus Callosum Guided by Coherency From In Utero Diffusion-Weighted MRI.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2020Article
- White and grey matter development in utero assessed using motion-corrected diffusion tensor imaging and its comparison to ex utero measures.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prenatal detection of abnormal white matter tracts might serve as a structural marker for altered neurodevelopment. As a result of many technical and patient-related challenges, the accuracy of prenatal tractography remains unknown. We hypothesized that characteristics of prenatal tractography of the corpus callosum and corticospinal tracts derived from fetal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) data are accurate and predictive of the integrity of these tracts postnatally. We compared callosal and corticospinal tracts of 12 subjects with paired prenatal (age: 23-35 gestational weeks) and postnatal (age: 1 day to 2 years) DTI examinations (b values of 0 s/mm
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.