Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29550762›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2018

Phosphorylated Hsp27 is mutually exclusive with ATRX loss and the IDH1

Hong-Qing Cai, Peng-Fei Wang, Hai-Peng Zhang, Zhi-Jian Cheng, Shou-Wei Li, Jie He, Yu Zhang, Jia-Jie Hao, Ming-Rong Wang, Chang-Xiang Yan and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Molecular chaperones in the brain endothelial barrier: neurotoxicity or neuroprotection?FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hong-Qing CaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Peng-Fei WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hai-Peng ZhangDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Zhi-Jian ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Shou-Wei LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jie HeDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jia-Jie HaoState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ming-Rong WangState Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chang-Xiang YanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Sanbo Brain Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing-Hai WanDepartment of Neurosurgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCapital Medical University · CNSecond Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CNAnhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify biomarkers for accurate classification of glioma. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe evaluated the heat shock protein 27 (Hsp27), phosphorylated Hsp27 (p-Hsp27), ATRX and IDH1

resultsWe found that Hsp27 and p-Hsp27 were mainly expressed in aggressive astrocytic gliomas. However, neither Hsp27 nor p-Hsp27 expression was related to survival time for any grade of glioma. Interestingly, p-Hsp27 was mutually exclusive with ATRX loss (ATRX

conclusionp-Hsp27 is a novel biomarker of glioma and might have important clinical value for further classification of patients with wild-type IDH1 and normal ATRX expression, for evaluating prognosis and for guidance for adjuvant therapy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsChi-Square DistributionFemaleGlioblastomaHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP27 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansImmunohistochemistryIsocitrate DehydrogenaseKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedATRX protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorHeat-Shock ProteinsHSP27 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSPB1 protein, humanIDH1 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMolecular ChaperonesX-linked Nuclear ProteinATRXgliomaHsp27IDH1prognosis

Identifiers

PMID29550762
PMCPMC6204978
OpenAlexW2793883867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.