Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29550614›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in biotechnology2018

Synthetic biology in probiotic lactic acid bacteria: At the frontier of living therapeutics.

Zachary Js Mays, Nikhil U Nair

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Designing live bacterial therapeutics for cancer.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Development of ZnSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Genetically Engineered Microorganisms and Their Impact on Human Health.International journal of clinical practice · 2024
    Review
  19. Impact ofBiotechnologia · 2024
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zachary Js MaysDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St, Science and Technology Center 276, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Nikhil U NairDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Tufts University, 4 Colby St, Science and Technology Center 276, Medford, MA 02155, USA. Electronic address: nikhil.nair@tufts.edu.

Funding

Metabolic engineering in humans: Altered gut microbes as a therapeutic platformDP2HD091798 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI NAIR, NIKHIL UNNI · 2016 to 2016
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD091798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The trillions of microbes hosted by humans can dictate health or illness depending on a multitude of genetic, environmental, and lifestyle factors that help define the human ecosystem. As the human microbiota is characterized, so can the interconnectivity of microbe-host-disease be realized and manipulated. Designing microbes as therapeutic agents can not only enable targeted drug delivery but also restore homeostasis within a perturbed microbial community. Used for centuries in fermentation and preservation of food, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have a long history of safe, and occasionally health promoting, interactions with the human gut, making them ideal candidates for engineered functionality. This review outlines available genetic tools, recent developments in biomedical applications, as well as potential future applications of synthetic biology to program LAB-based therapeutic systems.

Indexed as

Gene EditingGene Regulatory NetworksHumansLactobacillalesProbioticsSynthetic Biology

Identifiers

PMID29550614
PMCPMC6139064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.