Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29550524›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2018

The neural systems for perceptual updating.

Elisabeth Stöttinger, Markus Aichhorn, Britt Anderson, James Danckert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elisabeth StöttingerUniversity of Salzburg, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg 5020, Austria. Electronic address: elisabeth.stoettinger@sbg.ac.at.
Markus AichhornUniversity of Salzburg, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Salzburg 5020, Austria. Electronic address: markus.aichorn@sbg.ac.at.
Britt AndersonUniversity of Waterloo, Department of Psychology, Waterloo, Canada N2L 3G1; Centre for Theoretical Neuroscience, University of Waterloo, Canada N2L 3G1. Electronic address: britt@uwaterloo.ca.
James DanckertUniversity of Waterloo, Department of Psychology, Waterloo, Canada N2L 3G1. Electronic address: jdancker@uwaterloo.ca.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF V 480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In a constantly changing environment we must adapt to both abrupt and gradual changes to incoming information. Previously, we demonstrated that a distributed network (including the anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex) was active when participants updated their initial representations (e.g., it's a cat) in a gradually morphing picture task (e.g., now it's a rabbit; Stöttinger et al., 2015). To shed light on whether these activations reflect the proactive decisions to update or perceptual uncertainty, we introduced two additional conditions. By presenting picture morphs twice we controlled for uncertainty in perceptual decision making. Inducing an abrupt shift in a third condition allowed us to differentiate between a proactive decision in uncertainty-driven updating and a reactive decision in surprise-based updating. We replicated our earlier result, showing the robustness of the effect. In addition, we found activation in the anterior insula (bilaterally) and the mid frontal area/ACC in all three conditions, indicative of the importance of these areas in updating of all kinds. When participants were naïve as to the identity of the second object, we found higher activations in the mid-cingulate cortex and cuneus - areas typically associated with task difficulty, in addition to higher activations in the right TPJ most likely reflecting the shift to a new perspective. Activations associated with the proactive decision to update to a new interpretation were found in a network including the dorsal ACC known to be involved in exploration and the endogenous decision to switch to a new interpretation. These findings suggest a general network commonly engaged in all types of perceptual decision making supported by additional networks associated with perceptual uncertainty or updating provoked by either proactive or reactive decision making.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCerebral CortexDecision MakingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleVisual PerceptionYoung AdultPerceptual decision making, anterior insulaProactive vs. reactiveRepresentational updatingUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID29550524
PMCPMC6040633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.