ArticleThe Lancet. Public health2018
Socioeconomic disparities in first stroke incidence, quality of care, and survival: a nationwide registry-based cohort study of 44 million adults in England.
Article in The Lancet. Public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of causal pathways of socioeconomic inequalities in stroke.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- How equitable is digital rehabilitation for people after stroke? A systematic review using an equity approach.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review of ambulance service-based randomised controlled trials in stroke.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- The effect of non-invasive brain stimulation combined with motor imagery on upper limb motor function and activities of daily living in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Social determinants of health and stroke care and outcomes: SEQUINS lecture 2025.Equity neuroscience · 2026Article
- ICF Priorities and the Impact of Demographic Factors in a Paediatric Poststroke Population: An Observational Study.Child: care, health and development · 2026Observational
- Impact of Socioeconomic Status on Functional Outcome After Stroke in Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Temporal Trends and Drivers of Socioeconomic Inequalities in Stroke Care, Survival, and Long-Term Outcomes.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Low-cost Devices for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Review of Approaches, Designs, and Evidence.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2026Review
- Trends in the Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status With Stroke Incidence and Mortality From 2000 to 2022: A Population-Based Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Predisposing Factors, Pathologies, and Precipitating Factors Causing Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Stroke · 2026Review
- Sex and gender effects on incidence of migraine and stroke: a longitudinal observational study based on the german socio-economic panel.Biology of sex differences · 2026Observational
- Does Exposure to Certified Stroke Centers Affect All Communities Equitably? Stroke Patient Outcomes by Community Socioeconomic Status.Annals of emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Social Factors Influencing Decision-Making in Intracerebral Haemorrhage: A Survey among Neurology Professionals.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Association of Neighbourhood Deprivation with Secondary Prevention Prescribing and All-Cause Mortality among Stroke Patients in Scotland: A Population-Based Study.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Observational
- Stroke survivors' and carers' experiences of nutritional care after stroke: a qualitative study.Frontiers in stroke · 2026Article
- Social determinants of stroke prevalence in the United States adults: Analysis of 42 states using behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2022 data.Preventive medicine reports · 2026Article
- Area-Level Income Disparities and the Timing of First Ischemic Stroke: Insights From the 2019 National Inpatient Sample.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe aimed to estimate socioeconomic disparities in the incidence of hospitalisation for first-ever stroke, quality of care, and post-stroke survival for the adult population of England.
methodsIn this cohort study, we obtained data collected by a nationwide register on patients aged 18 years or older hospitalised for first-ever acute ischaemic stroke or primary intracerebral haemorrhage in England from July 1, 2013, to March 31, 2016. We classified socioeconomic status at the level of Lower Super Output Areas using the Index of Multiple Deprivation, a neighbourhood measure of deprivation. Multivariable models were fitted to estimate the incidence of hospitalisation for first stroke (negative binomial), quality of care using 12 quality metrics (multilevel logistic), and all-cause 1 year case fatality (Cox proportional hazards).
findingsOf the 43·8 million adults in England, 145 324 were admitted to hospital with their first-ever stroke: 126 640 (87%) with ischaemic stroke, 17 233 (12%) with intracerebral haemorrhage, and 1451 (1%) with undetermined stroke type. We observed a socioeconomic gradient in the incidence of hospitalisation for ischaemic stroke (adjusted incidence rate ratio 2·0, 95% CI 1·7-2·3 for the most vs least deprived deciles) and intracerebral haemorrhage (1·6, 1·3-1·9). Patients from the lowest socioeconomic groups had first stroke a median of 7 years earlier than those from the highest (p<0·0001), and had a higher prevalence of pre-stroke disability and diabetes. Patients from lower socioeconomic groups were less likely to receive five of 12 care processes but were more likely to receive early supported discharge (adjusted odds ratio 1·14, 95% CI 1·07-1·22). Low socioeconomic status was associated with a 26% higher adjusted risk of 1-year mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 1·26, 95% CI 1·20-1·33, for highest vs lowest deprivation decile), but this gradient was largely attenuated after adjustment for the presence of pre-stroke diabetes, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation (1·11, 1·05-1·17).
interpretationWide socioeconomic disparities exist in the burden of ischaemic stroke and intracerebral haemorrhage in England, most notably in stroke hospitalisation risk and case fatality and, to a lesser extent, in the quality of health care. Reducing these disparities requires interventions to improve the quality of acute stroke care and address disparities in cardiovascular risk factors present before stroke.
fundingNHS England and the Welsh Government.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.