Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29550285›Full record

ArticleClinical breast cancer2018

Trends and Patterns of Utilization of Hypofractionated Postmastectomy Radiotherapy: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

Sriram Venigalla, David M Guttmann, Varsha Jain, Sonam Sharma, Gary M Freedman, Jacob E Shabason

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical breast cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Moderately hypofractionated post-operative radiation therapy for breast cancer: preferences amongst radiation oncologists from countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in young versus older women with breast cancer: a retrospective study from India.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Predictive factors for persistent and late radiation complications in breast cancer survivors.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sriram VenigallaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: sriram.venigalla@uphs.upenn.edu.
David M GuttmannDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Varsha JainDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Sonam SharmaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Gary M FreedmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Jacob E ShabasonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardKL2TR001879 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEAGHER, EMMA ANNE · 2016 to 2025
$13.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001879
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe acceptance of hypofractionated radiotherapy in treating breast cancer in the breast conservation therapy setting has stimulated interest in hypofractionated postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). We assessed national trends and patterns of utilization of hypofractionated PMRT. PATIENTS AND

methodsWomen 18 years of age or older with breast cancer treated with mastectomy and PMRT to the chest wall with or without regional lymph nodes from 2004 to 2014 were identified from the National Cancer Database. A standard fractionation cohort was defined as patients receiving 180 to 200 cGy per fraction to a total dose of 4500 to 7000 cGy over 5 to 7 weeks, and a hypofractionation cohort was defined as those receiving 250 to 400 cGy per fraction to a total dose of 3000 to 6000 cGy over 2 to 5 weeks. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with hypofractionated PMRT use.

resultsWe identified 113,981 patients who met study criteria. Overall, hypofractionated PMRT use was low (1.1%) although utilization increased over time (P ≤ .001). Older age, greater comorbidity, further distance from treatment facility, treatment at academic facilities, less extensive disease, and recent treatment year were statistically significant predictors of hypofractionation use compared with standard fractionation. Conversely, breast reconstruction and receipt of chemotherapy were negative predictors.

conclusionBecause of the absence of high-level evidence to support its use, hypofractionated PMRT was uncommonly utilized in the United States from 2004 to 2014, although a small increase in use was noted over time. Findings from this study might be useful in designing future studies, and might serve as a baseline for evaluation of future changes in practice patterns.

Indexed as

MastectomyRadiation Dose HypofractionationAgedBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Radiation DosageRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRegistriesUnited StatesBreast cancerCohort studyDose hypofractionationMastectomyRadiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID29550285
PMCPMC6103917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.