Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29550173›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nutrition education and behavior2018

Salad Bars Increased Selection and Decreased Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables 1 Month After Installation in Title I Elementary Schools: A Plate Waste Study.

Melanie K Bean, Bethany Brady Spalding, Elizabeth Theriault, Kayla-Brooke Dransfield, Alexandra Sova, Mary Dunne Stewart

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Validity of Weighed and Digital Photography Diet Estimation Study in a Childcare Setting.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Impact of school salad bars on fruit and vegetable selection, intake, and waste in Mid-Atlantic elementary schools.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melanie K BeanDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA. Electronic address: mkbean@vcu.edu.
Bethany Brady SpaldingGreater Richmond Fit4Kids, Richmond, VA.
Elizabeth TheriaultRichmond City Health District, Richmond, VA.
Kayla-Brooke DransfieldGreater Richmond Fit4Kids, Richmond, VA.
Alexandra SovaDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Mary Dunne StewartGreater Richmond Fit4Kids, Richmond, VA.

Funding

Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000058 · NCATS · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MOELLER, FREDERICK GERARD · 2012 to 2015
$12.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000058
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the 1-month impact of salad bars on fruit and vegetable (FV) selection, intake, and waste.

designPre-post quasi-experimental design.

settingTitle I elementary schools in a large, urban district in central Virginia.

participantsStudents (grades 1-5; >95% African American) from 2 elementary schools participated in plate waste assessments (282 plates were rated at baseline, 443 at post-assessment); fourth- and fifth-grade students from 15 (of 18 eligible) schools (n = 1,193) responded to surveys.

interventionDigital imagery plate waste assessments were conducted before salad bars were installed (baseline) and 1 month afterward (post). Post-surveys examined student perceptions of salad bars.

main outcome measuresFruit and vegetable selection, consumption, and waste. ANALYSIS: General linear models (without considering clustering) examined changes in outcomes, controlling for school. Frequencies and qualitative analyses were applied to survey data.

resultsAt post, students selected more types of FVs (1.81-2.58; P < .001), although FV consumption decreased by 0.65 cups (P < .001). Given the smaller portions selected, there was less FV waste (0.27 cups; P < .001) at post. Students liked the ability to choose FV from salad bars. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Short-term exposure to salad bars increased the number of FV students chose but decreased FV consumption. Additional strategies are needed to increase FV consumption.

Indexed as

Food ServicesFruitVegetablesChildFemaleFood PreferencesHumansLinear ModelsMaleNutrition PolicySaladsSchoolsStudentsVirginiaWaste ProductsWaste Productselementary schoolNational School Lunch Programplate wastesalad bars

Identifiers

PMID29550173
PMCPMC5995641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.