Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29549754›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2018

How many days of global positioning system (GPS) monitoring do you need to measure activity space environments in health research?

Shannon N Zenk, Stephen A Matthews, Amber N Kraft, Kelly K Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Using GPS Technologies to Examine Community Mobility in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shannon N ZenkUniversity of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, 845 S. Damen Ave., 9th Floor, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Electronic address: szenk@uic.edu.
Stephen A MatthewsPennsylvania State University, Department of Sociology and Criminology, Department of Anthropology, and Popualtion Research Institute, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA 16802-6211, USA. Electronic address: matthews@psu.edu.
Amber N KraftUniversity of Illinois at Chicago Department of Psychology, 1007 W Harrison St., Chicago, IL 60607, USA. Electronic address: akraft3@uic.edu.
Kelly K JonesUniversity of Illinois at Chicago College of Nursing, 845 S. Damen Ave., 9th Floor, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Electronic address: kellykj@uic.edu.

Funding

A Tool for Geospatial Analysis of Physical ActivityU01CA130771 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI PATRICK, KEVIN · 2007 to 2010
$2.9M
Environmental Attributes and Weight Control: Study of Over 1.3 Million VeteransR01CA172726 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI TARLOV, ELIZABETH, ZENK, SHANNON N · 2013 to 2016
$2.3M
Activity space and measuring environmental exposure in behavioral researchR21CA195543 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MATTHEWS, STEPHEN A, ZENK, SHANNON N · 2015 to 2016
$390k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172726NCI NIH HHS R21 CA195543NCI NIH HHS U01 CA130771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the number of days of global positioning system (GPS) monitoring needed to measure attributes of an individual's routine activity space. Multiple alternative activity space representations (cumulative, mean daily), measures (kernel density, route buffer, convex hull), and attributes (area size, supermarkets, fast food restaurants, parks) were examined. Results suggested wide variability in required GPS days to obtain valid estimates of activity space attributes (1-23 days). In general, fewer days were needed for mean daily activity space representations, kernel density measures, and densities of environmental exposures (vs. counts). While kernel density measures reliably estimated between-person differences in attributes after just a few days, most variability in environmental attributes for convex hull and route buffer measures was within-person. Based on these results, a minimum of 14 days of valid GPS data is recommended to measure activity spaces.

Indexed as

Environmental ExposureGeographic Information SystemsHealth Services ResearchActivities of Daily LivingChicagoFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParks, RecreationalResidence CharacteristicsRestaurantsTime FactorsActivity spaceEnvironmental exposureGPSNeighborhoodReliabilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID29549754
PMCPMC5963999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.