Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29549536›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2018

Predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis focusing on RDI using ordered logistic regression analysis.

Yuko Kanbayashi, Takeshi Ishikawa, Motohiro Kanazawa, Yuki Nakajima, Rumi Kawano, Yusuke Tabuchi, Tomoko Yoshioka, Norihiko Ihara, Toyoshi Hosokawa, Koichi Takayama and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuko KanbayashiDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan. ykokanba@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4680-5133
Takeshi IshikawaOutpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Motohiro KanazawaOutpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuki NakajimaDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Rumi KawanoOutpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yusuke TabuchiDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Tomoko YoshiokaOutpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Norihiko IharaDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Toyoshi HosokawaPain Treatment and Palliative Care Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Koichi TakayamaDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Keisuke ShikataDepartment of Pharmacy, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Tetsuya TaguchiOutpatient Oncology Unit, University Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JPUniversity Hospital Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is expected to maintain the relative dose intensity (RDI) of chemotherapy and improve safety, information is limited. However, the optimal selection of patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is an important issue from a medical economics viewpoint. Therefore, this retrospective study identified factors that could predict these eligible patients to maintain the RDI. The participants included 166 cancer patients undergoing pegfilgrastim prophylaxis combined with chemotherapy in our outpatient chemotherapy center between March 2015 and April 2017. Variables were extracted from clinical records for regression analysis of factors related to maintenance of the RDI. RDI was classified into four categories: 100% = 0, 85% or < 100% = 1, 60% or < 85% = 2, and < 60% = 3. Multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictive factors in patients eligible for pegfilgrastim prophylaxis to maintain the RDI. Threshold measures were examined using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis curve. Age [odds ratio (OR) 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.11; P < 0.0001], anemia (grade) (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.10-2.84; P = 0.0184), and administration 24-72 h after chemotherapy (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.22-0.89; P = 0.0224) were factors that significantly correlated with RDI maintenance. ROC curve analysis of the group that failed to maintain the RDI indicated that the threshold for age was 70 years and above, with a sensitivity of 60.0% and specificity of 80.2% (area under the curve: 0.74). In conclusion, younger age, anemia (less), and administration of pegfilgrastim 24-72 h after chemotherapy were significant factors for RDI maintenance.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemotherapy-Induced Febrile NeutropeniaFemaleFilgrastimHematologic AgentsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleNeoplasmsPolyethylene GlycolsPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesROC CurveAntineoplastic AgentsFilgrastimHematologic AgentspegfilgrastimPolyethylene Glycols24–72 hAgeAnemiaPegfilgrastimRDI

Identifiers

PMID29549536
OpenAlexW2792595625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.