Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29549475›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2018

Prenatal Oral Health Counseling by Primary Care Physicians: Results of a National Survey.

M Gentry Byrd, Rocio B Quinonez, R Gary Rozier, Ceib Phillips, Marian Mehegan, Ledia Martinez, Kimon Divaris

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M Gentry ByrdDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Rocio B QuinonezDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry and Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. rocio_quinonez@unc.edu.
R Gary RozierDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ceib PhillipsDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Marian MeheganUSDHHS Office on Women's Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Ledia MartinezUSDHHS Office on Women's Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Kimon DivarisDepartments of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry and Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives Limited information exists on the extent oral health is addressed in the context of prenatal care. This study sought to investigate characteristics of primary care physicians (PCP) who provide oral health counseling to pregnant women. Methods The study relied upon data from the 2013 Survey of PCP on Oral Health. Provision of oral health counseling to pregnant women (sometimes vs. rarely/never) was the primary outcome. Covariates included respondents' demographic and practice characteristics, oral health-related training, knowledge, attitudes, preparedness and clinical behaviors. The analytical strategy included bivariate tests and multivariable Poisson regression modeling, accounting for the survey design; inference was based upon marginal effects estimation. Results Two-thirds of PCP (233 out of 366 respondents) reported providing oral health counseling to pregnant women. In bivariate comparisons, female PCP, PCP with oral health-specific instruction during medical training, favorable oral health-related attitudes, behaviors, preparedness, and knowledge were more likely to provide counseling (p < 0.05). Multivariable analyses confirmed the independent associations of female gender [marginal effect = + 9.7 percentage points (p.p.); 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.0-19.0], years in practice (- 0.4 p.p. for each added year; 95% CI = - 0.09 to 0.0), oral health continuing education (+ 13.2 p.p.; 95% CI = 2.6-23.8), preparedness (+ 23.0 p.p.; 95% CI = 16.9-29.0) and oral health counseling of adult patients with other conditions (+ 8.8 p.p.; 95% CI = 4.6-13.3) with prenatal oral health counseling. Conclusions for Practice A considerable proportion of PCP nationwide counsel pregnant patients on oral health. Provider attributes including education and preparedness appear as promising targets for interventions aimed to enhance pregnant women's oral health and care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCounselingOral HealthPhysicians, Primary CareAdultFemaleHealth Care SurveysHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'PregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareCounselingOral healthPrenatal carePrimary care physicians

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.