Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29549387›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2018

One-stage exchange with antibacterial hydrogel coated implants provides similar results to two-stage revision, without the coating, for the treatment of peri-prosthetic infection.

Nicola Capuano, Nicola Logoluso, Enrico Gallazzi, Lorenzo Drago, Carlo Luca Romanò

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Use of a Bioresorbable Antibacterial Coating (DACAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Partial versus full revision in cementless single-stage exchange for hip periprosthetic joint infection: a multicenter comparative study with 10-year survivorship analysis.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Periprosthetic Knee Infection - Part 2: Treatment.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antibacterial hydrogel coating in joint mega-prosthesis: results of a comparative series.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicola CapuanoDepartment for Orthopaedics, San Luca Hospital, Vallo della Lucania, Italy.
Nicola LogolusoDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery of Osteo-articular Infections, I.R.C.C.S. Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
Enrico GallazziDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery of Osteo-articular Infections, I.R.C.C.S. Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
Lorenzo DragoLaboratory of Clinical Chemistry and Microbiology, I.R.C.C.S. Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Milan, Italy.
Carlo Luca RomanòDepartment of Reconstructive Surgery of Osteo-articular Infections, I.R.C.C.S. Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy. carlo.romano@grupposandonato.it.
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAim of this study was to verify the hypothesis that a one-stage exchange procedure, performed with an antibiotic-loaded, fast-resorbable hydrogel coating, provides similar infection recurrence rate than a two-stage procedure without the coating, in patients affected by peri-prosthetic joint infection (PJI).

methodsIn this two-center case-control, study, 22 patients, treated with a one-stage procedure, using implants coated with an antibiotic-loaded hydrogel [defensive antibacterial coating (DAC)], were compared with 22 retrospective matched controls, treated with a two-stage revision procedure, without the coating.

resultsAt a mean follow-up of 29.3 ± 5.0 months, two patients (9.1%) in the DAC group showed an infection recurrence, compared to three patients (13.6%) in the two-stage group. Clinical scores were similar between groups, while average hospital stay and antibiotic treatment duration were significantly reduced after one-stage, compared to two-stage (18.9 ± 2.9 versus 35.8 ± 3.4 and 23.5 ± 3.3 versus 53.7 ± 5.6 days, respectively).

conclusionsAlthough in a relatively limited series of patients, our data shows similar infection recurrence rate after one-stage exchange with DAC-coated implants, compared to two-stage revision without coating, with reduced overall hospitalization time and antibiotic treatment duration. These findings warrant further studies in the possible applications of antibacterial coating technologies to treat implant-related infections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Coated Materials, BiocompatibleKnee ProsthesisAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansHydrogelsLength of StayMaleProspective StudiesProsthesis-Related InfectionsRecurrenceReoperationRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleHydrogelsCoatingDACInfectionOne-stage revisionPJITwo-stage revision

Identifiers

PMID29549387
OpenAlexW2792565683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.