Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29549364›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Mapping road network communities for guiding disease surveillance and control strategies.

Emanuele Strano, Matheus P Viana, Alessandro Sorichetta, Andrew J Tatem

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emanuele StranoDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. estrano@mit.edu.
Matheus P VianaIBM Research Brazil, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9288-2108
Alessandro SorichettaWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK.
Andrew J TatemWorldPop, Department of Geography and Environment, University of Southampton, Highfield, Southampton, UK. A.J.Tatem@soton.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106866/Z/15/ZWellcome Trust 204613/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human mobility is increasing in its volume, speed and reach, leading to the movement and introduction of pathogens through infected travelers. An understanding of how areas are connected, the strength of these connections and how this translates into disease spread is valuable for planning surveillance and designing control and elimination strategies. While analyses have been undertaken to identify and map connectivity in global air, shipping and migration networks, such analyses have yet to be undertaken on the road networks that carry the vast majority of travellers in low and middle income settings. Here we present methods for identifying road connectivity communities, as well as mapping bridge areas between communities and key linkage routes. We apply these to Africa, and show how many highly-connected communities straddle national borders and when integrating malaria prevalence and population data as an example, the communities change, highlighting regions most strongly connected to areas of high burden. The approaches and results presented provide a flexible tool for supporting the design of disease surveillance and control strategies through mapping areas of high connectivity that form coherent units of intervention and key link routes between communities for targeting surveillance.

Indexed as

Community NetworksModels, TheoreticalPopulation SurveillanceAfricaHumansMalaria, FalciparumPlasmodium falciparumTravel

Identifiers

PMID29549364
PMCPMC5856805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.