ArticleScientific reports2018
Forensic characterization of 15 autosomal STRs in four populations from Xinjiang, China, and genetic relationships with neighboring populations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pilot work of the 10K Chinese People Genomic Diversity Project along the Silk Road suggests a complex east-west admixture landscape and biological adaptations.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Article
- Unethical studies on Chinese minority groups are being retracted - but not fast enough, critics say.Nature · 2024Article
- A forensic population database of autosomal STR and X-STR markers in the Qiang ethnic minority of China.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Genetic structure and forensic characteristics of the Kyrgyz population from Kizilsu Kirghiz autonomous prefecture based on autosomal DIPs.International journal of legal medicine · 2022Article
- Genetic characterization of the highlander Tibetan population from Qinghai-Tibet Plateau revealed by X chromosomal STRs.PloS one · 2022Article
- Systematic selections and forensic application evaluations of 111 individual identification SNPs in the Chinese Inner Mongolia Manchu group.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- The Heart of Silk Road "Xinjiang," Its Genetic Portray, and Forensic Parameters Inferred From Autosomal STRs.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Forensic applications and genetic characterization of Liaoning Han population revealed by extended set of autosomal STRs.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- Population genetic portrait of Pakistani Lahore-Christians based on 32 STR loci.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The Ong Be language-speaking population in Hainan Island: genetic diversity, phylogenetic characteristics and reflections on ethnicity.Molecular biology reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Correction · 2022-07-13Concerns/Issues about Data · Lack of Approval from Company/Institution · Updated to Retraction ·
- Retraction · 2024-06-17Concerns/Issues about Human Subject Welfare · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Objections by Author(s) · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) ·
- Erratum issued
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of China (XUARC) harbors 47 ethnic groups including the Manchu (MCH: 0.11%), Mongols (MGL: 0.81%), Kyrgyz (KGZ: 0.86%) and Uzbek (UZK: 0.066%). To establish DNA databases for these populations, allele frequency distributions for 15 autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) loci were determined using the AmpFlSTR Identifiler PCR amplification kit. There was no evidence of departures from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) in any of the four populations and minimal departure from linkage equilibrium (LE) for a very small number of pairwise combinations of loci. The probabilities of identity for the different populations ranged from 1 in 1.51 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.