ArticleNeurology2018
The state of clinical research in neurology.
Article in Neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- "The Machine Will See You Now": A Clinician's Perspective on Artificial "Intelligence" In Clinical Care.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Experimental Neurotherapeutics: Surfing the Tidal Wave of New Opportunities.Annals of neurology · 2023Article
- Evidence from ClinicalTrials.gov on the growth of Digital Health Technologies in neurology trials.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Challenges and opportunities for research clinicians interested in pain: results of a survey.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- The PreDoc Program: Pipeline Healthcare Apprenticeship Program through the Lens of a Neurologist.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2019Article
- Fragile X-Associated Tremor/Ataxia Syndrome: Unmet Needs and a Path for the Future.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo study and provide an update on the state of clinical research in neurology in the United States.
methodsUS American Academy of Neurology members and chairs of departments of neurology were surveyed regarding clinical research in 2016. NIH data on the neuroscience pipeline and extramural grant funding were also collected.
resultsThe response rate was 32% (n = 254) for nonchair researchers and 58% (n = 67) for department chairs. Researcher respondents were on average 50 years old, 66% were men, and 81% were actively conducting clinical research, with phase II/III clinical trials and outcome measure studies being the most common type of research conducted. Time to conduct research, recruitment, and administrative burden were the major barriers reported. According to department chairs, funding and training opportunities in patient-oriented research have increased over the last 10 years. Overall, applicants to neuroscience-specific NIH institutes for extramural funding have decreased over the same time period.
conclusionsThe state of clinical research in neurology has remained relatively stable over the last 10 years, but neurologists still have barriers in conducting clinical research. There has been an interval decrease in neuroscience applicants for NIH funding, which raises concerns about the pipeline and future of clinical research in neurology. These results will serve as a reference for the development of solutions to these issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.