ArticleBMJ open2018
Appropriate use of medical imaging in two Spanish public hospitals: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: Sex differences in inappropriate imaging requests-insights from the Medical Imaging Decision and Support (MIDAS) study.European radiology · 2026Article
- Analysis of the Justification for Spinal Computed Tomography (CT) Scans Performed in Togo.Journal of medical radiation sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring pre-MRI imaging tests: patient survey reveals potential implications for healthcare efficiency in Israel.Israel journal of health policy research · 2024Article
- CT and MRI imaging in Sweden: retrospective appropriateness analysis of large referral samples.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Measuring appropriateness of diagnostic imaging: a scoping review.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Gender Differences in the Impact of Recommendations on Diagnostic Imaging Tests: A Retrospective Study 2007-2021.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the appropriate use of chest CT-Scans in the diagnosis of hospitalized patients in shiraz teaching hospitals, Southern Iran.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2022Article
- Automated vetting of radiology referrals: exploring natural language processing and traditional machine learning approaches.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- Appropriateness of radiological diagnostic tests in otolaryngology.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- The value of referral information and assessment - a cross sectional study of radiographers' perceptions.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Comparison of Diagnostic Recommendations from Individual Physicians versus the Collective Intelligence of Multiple Physicians in Ambulatory Cases Referred for Specialist Consultation.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2022Article
- Appropriateness of Head CT Scans at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Ethiopia.Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2022Article
- Using text analysis software to identify determinants of inappropriate clinical question reporting and diagnostic procedure referrals in Reggio Emilia, Italy.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Application of the ESR iGuide clinical decision support system to the imaging pathway of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma: preliminary findings.La Radiologia medica · 2020Article
- Cumulative exposure to ionising radiation from diagnostic imaging tests: a 12-year follow-up population-based analysis in Spain.BMJ open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the appropriateness of medical imaging examinations involving radiation and to estimate the effective radiation dose and costs associated.
designCross-sectional retrospective study.
settingTwo Spanish public tertiary hospitals.
participants2022 medical imaging tests were extracted from the radiology information system in February and March of 2014. MRI and ultrasound examinations were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Five outcomes were set independently by at least two researchers according to four guidelines: (1) appropriate; (2) inappropriate; (3) inappropriate due to repetition, if the timing to carry out next diagnostic tests was incorrect according to guidelines; (4) not adequately justified, if the referral form did not include enough clinical information to allow us to understand the patient's clinical condition; and (5) not included in the guidelines, if the referral could not be matched to a clinical scenario described in the guidelines. We estimated the prevalence of the five categories according to relevant clinical and sociodemographic variables and the effective radiation dose and costs for each category.
resultsApproximately half of the imaging tests were deemed as appropriate (967, 47.8%) while one-third (634, 31.4%) were considered inappropriate. 19.6% of the effective dose and 25.2% of the cost were associated with inappropriate tests. Women were less likely than men to have an imaging test classified as appropriate (adjusted OR 0.70,95% CI 0.57 to 0.86). Imaging tests requested by general practitioners were less likely to be considered appropriate than those requested by central services (adjusted OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.93). Mammography and CT were more likely to be appropriate than conventional X-rays.
conclusionThere was a significant frequency of inappropriateness, which resulted in a high percentage of associated effective radiation dose. Percentage of inappropriateness depends on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics such as sex, age, referral physician and medical imaging test.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.