Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29548598›Full record

ArticlePatient education and counseling2018

Deaf patient-provider communication and lung cancer screening: Health Information National Trends survey in American Sign Language (HINTS-ASL).

P Kushalnagar, Alina Engelman, G Sadler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient education and counseling, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Can Cancer Education Programs Improve Health Literacy Among Deaf and Hard of Hearing Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Community Health Navigators for Cancer Screening Among Deaf, Deafblind, and Hard of Hearing Adults Who Use American Sign Language.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. ASL Consent in the Digital Informed Consent Process.Journal on technology and persons with disabilities : ... Annual International Technology and Persons with Disabilities Conference · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

P KushalnagarDepartment of Psychology, Gallaudet University, Washington, D.C, United States. Electronic address: Poorna.kushalnagar@gallaudet.edu.
Alina EngelmanDepartment of Nursing and Health Sciences, California State University, East Bay, United States.
G SadlerMoore Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, United States.
California State University, East Bay · USGallaudet University · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

Deaf Sign Language Users' Experiences in Seeking Health InformationR15DC014816 · NIDCD · ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KUSHALNAGAR, POORNA · 2015 to 2015
$418k
NIDCD NIH HHS R15 DC014816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether mode of communication and patient centered communication (PCC) with physicians were associated with the likelihood of deaf smokers inquiring about lung cancer screening.

methodsAn accessible health survey including questions about PCC, modes of communication, smoking status and lung cancer screening was administered in American Sign Language (HINTS-ASL) to a nationwide sample of deaf adults from February to August 2017. Of 703 deaf adults who answered the lung screening question, 188 were 55-80 years old.

resultsThe odds ratio of asking about a lung cancer screening test was higher for people with lung disease or used ASL (directly or through an interpreter) to communicate with their physicians. PCC was not associated with asking about a lung cancer screening test.

conclusionCurrent or former smokers who are deaf and use ASL are at greater risk for poorer health outcomes if they do not have accessible communication with their physicians. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Optimal language access through interpreters or directly in ASL is critical when discussing smoking cessation or lung cancer screening tests. Counseling and shared decision-making will help improve high-risk deaf patients' understanding and decision-making about lung cancer screening.

Indexed as

CommunicationDeafnessLung NeoplasmsPhysician-Patient RelationsSign LanguageAdultDecision MakingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPatient-Centered CarePersons with Hearing DisabilitiesPreventive Health ServicesCommunicationDeafLung cancerScreeningSign Language

Identifiers

PMID29548598
PMCPMC5985205
OpenAlexW2793168236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.