Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29547873›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2019

Adult attachment orientations and well-being during the transition to parenthood.

Jeffry A Simpson, W Steven Rholes

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. "Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Humor and Attachment: Exploring the Relationships between Insecure Attachment and the Comic Styles.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Autistic-Like Traits in Members of the General Population and Mate Retention Tactics: The Mediation of Attachment Styles and Reproductive Strategies.Evolutionary psychology : an international journal of evolutionary approaches to psychology and behavior
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffry A SimpsonUniversity of Minnesota, USA. Electronic address: simps108@umn.edu.
W Steven RholesTexas A&M University, USA. Electronic address: wsr@psyc.tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

ATTACHMENT STYLES, STRESS, AND CLOSS RELATIONSHIPSR01MH049599 · NIMH · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM · PI RHOLES, WILLIAM STEVEN · 1995 to 2005
$931k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH049599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we discuss theory and research on how people who have different adult romantic attachment orientations fare across one of life's often happiest, but also most chronically stressful, events-the transition to parenthood. We first discuss central principles of attachment theory and then review empirical research revealing how two types of attachment insecurity-anxiety and avoidance-tend to prospectively predict unique patterns of relational and personal outcomes across this often challenging life event. We also suggest how many of these findings can be understood within a diathesis-stress process model that has guided our own research on the transition to parenthood.

Indexed as

Object AttachmentAdultAnxietyAvoidance LearningDisease SusceptibilityEmpirical ResearchHumansInterpersonal RelationsModels, PsychologicalPsychological Theory

Identifiers

PMID29547873
PMCPMC6127006
OpenAlexW2883720455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.