Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29546880›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2018

Cell motility in cancer invasion and metastasis: insights from simple model organisms.

Christina H Stuelten, Carole A Parent, Denise J Montell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 282 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
282citing papers in PubMed
27.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

282 citing papers in PubMed, 530 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The CaThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

222 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina H StueltenLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Carole A ParentLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Denise J MontellMolecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology Department, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, USA.
Center for Cancer Research · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Spatiotemporal regulation of collective cell behaviors in Drosophila: Diversity Supplement for Predoctoral TrainingR01GM046425 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI MONTELL, DENISE J. · 1996 to 2025
$11.7M
Making and breaking cell-cell contacts in developmentR01GM073164 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI MONTELL, DENISE J. · 2005 to 2025
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046425NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM073164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis remains the greatest challenge in the clinical management of cancer. Cell motility is a fundamental and ancient cellular behaviour that contributes to metastasis and is conserved in simple organisms. In this Review, we evaluate insights relevant to human cancer that are derived from the study of cell motility in non-mammalian model organisms. Dictyostelium discoideum, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster and Danio rerio permit direct observation of cells moving in complex native environments and lend themselves to large-scale genetic and pharmacological screening. We highlight insights derived from each of these organisms, including the detailed signalling network that governs chemotaxis towards chemokines; a novel mechanism of basement membrane invasion; the positive role of E-cadherin in collective direction-sensing; the identification and optimization of kinase inhibitors for metastatic thyroid cancer on the basis of work in flies; and the value of zebrafish for live imaging, especially of vascular remodelling and interactions between tumour cells and host tissues. While the motility of tumour cells and certain host cells promotes metastatic spread, the motility of tumour-reactive T cells likely increases their antitumour effects. Therefore, it is important to elucidate the mechanisms underlying all types of cell motility, with the ultimate goal of identifying combination therapies that will increase the motility of beneficial cells and block the spread of harmful cells.

Indexed as

Cell MovementAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansChemotactic FactorsDictyosteliumDrosophila melanogasterFemaleHumansNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsOvarySignal TransductionZebrafishChemotactic Factors

Identifiers

PMID29546880
PMCPMC6790333
OpenAlexW2793152198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.