Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29546735›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2018

Correcting for motion artifact in handheld laser speckle images.

Ben Lertsakdadet, Bruce Y Yang, Cody E Dunn, Adrien Ponticorvo, Christian Crouzet, Nicole Bernal, Anthony J Durkin, Bernard Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Handheld motion stabilized laser speckle imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ben LertsakdadetBeckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Bruce Y YangBeckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Cody E DunnBeckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Adrien PonticorvoBeckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Christian CrouzetBeckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Nicole BernalUniversity of California, Irvine, California, United States.
Anthony J DurkinBeckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.
Bernard ChoiBeckman Laser Institute and Medical Clinic, Irvine, California, United States.

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
Virtual Photonocs TechnologiesP41EB015890 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DURKIN, ANTHONY · 2012 to 2017
$7.0M
NRSA Training CoreTL1TR001415 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CAIOZZO, VINCENT JAMES, HEAD, ELIZABETH · 2015 to 2023
$4.2M
Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging for Burn Wound Severity AssessmentR01GM108634 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI DURKIN, ANTHONY J · 2014 to 2023
$2.8M
Training Program in Cardiovascular Applied Research and EntrepreneurshipT32HL116270 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER C. W. · 2013 to 2022
$1.6M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001415NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL116270NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015890NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108634
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser speckle imaging (LSI) is a wide-field optical technique that enables superficial blood flow quantification. LSI is normally performed in a mounted configuration to decrease the likelihood of motion artifact. However, mounted LSI systems are cumbersome and difficult to transport quickly in a clinical setting for which portability is essential in providing bedside patient care. To address this issue, we created a handheld LSI device using scientific grade components. To account for motion artifact of the LSI device used in a handheld setup, we incorporated a fiducial marker (FM) into our imaging protocol and determined the difference between highest and lowest speckle contrast values for the FM within each data set (Kbest and Kworst). The difference between Kbest and Kworst in mounted and handheld setups was 8% and 52%, respectively, thereby reinforcing the need for motion artifact quantification. When using a threshold FM speckle contrast value (KFM) to identify a subset of images with an acceptable level of motion artifact, mounted and handheld LSI measurements of speckle contrast of a flow region (KFLOW) in in vitro flow phantom experiments differed by 8%. Without the use of the FM, mounted and handheld KFLOW values differed by 20%. To further validate our handheld LSI device, we compared mounted and handheld data from an in vivo porcine burn model of superficial and full thickness burns. The speckle contrast within the burn region (KBURN) of the mounted and handheld LSI data differed by <4  %   when accounting for motion artifact using the FM, which is less than the speckle contrast difference between superficial and full thickness burns. Collectively, our results suggest the potential of handheld LSI with an FM as a suitable alternative to mounted LSI, especially in challenging clinical settings with space limitations such as the intensive care unit.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, CardiovascularAnimalsArtifactsBurnsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMovementPhantoms, ImagingSkinSwineblood flowcoregistrationfiducial markerhandheldimage alignmentlaser speckle imagingwide-field imaging

Identifiers

PMID29546735
PMCPMC5852319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.