ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2018
Correcting for motion artifact in handheld laser speckle images.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Handheld laser speckle contrast imaging probe: quantitative video rate assessment of tissue perfusion in animal and patient applications.Biophotonics discovery · 2025Article
- Comparing laser speckle contrast imaging and indocyanine green angiography for assessment of parathyroid perfusion.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Prediction of motion artifacts caused by translation in handheld laser speckle contrast imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2023Article
- Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography of the Intestine: How to Prevent Motion Artifacts in Open and Laparoscopic Surgery?Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Real-time, multi-spectral motion artefact correction and compensation for laser speckle contrast imaging.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A pilot feasibility study to assess vascularity and perfusion of parathyroid glands using a portable hand-held imager.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2022Article
- Handheld versus mounted laser speckle contrast perfusion imaging demonstrated in psoriasis lesions.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Real-time visualization of renal microperfusion using laser speckle contrast imaging.Journal of biomedical optics · 2021Article
- Transcranial chronic optical access to longitudinally measure cerebral blood flow.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2021Article
- Exploration of movement artefacts in handheld laser speckle contrast perfusion imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Handheld motion stabilized laser speckle imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2019Article
- Fourier transforms for fast and quantitative Laser Speckle Imaging.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Clinical applications of laser speckle contrast imaging: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2019Review
- Comparison of speckleplethysmographic (SPG) and photoplethysmographic (PPG) imaging by Monte Carlo simulations andBiomedical optics express · 2018Article
- Wearable speckle plethysmography (SPG) for characterizing microvascular flow and resistance.Biomedical optics express · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser speckle imaging (LSI) is a wide-field optical technique that enables superficial blood flow quantification. LSI is normally performed in a mounted configuration to decrease the likelihood of motion artifact. However, mounted LSI systems are cumbersome and difficult to transport quickly in a clinical setting for which portability is essential in providing bedside patient care. To address this issue, we created a handheld LSI device using scientific grade components. To account for motion artifact of the LSI device used in a handheld setup, we incorporated a fiducial marker (FM) into our imaging protocol and determined the difference between highest and lowest speckle contrast values for the FM within each data set (Kbest and Kworst). The difference between Kbest and Kworst in mounted and handheld setups was 8% and 52%, respectively, thereby reinforcing the need for motion artifact quantification. When using a threshold FM speckle contrast value (KFM) to identify a subset of images with an acceptable level of motion artifact, mounted and handheld LSI measurements of speckle contrast of a flow region (KFLOW) in in vitro flow phantom experiments differed by 8%. Without the use of the FM, mounted and handheld KFLOW values differed by 20%. To further validate our handheld LSI device, we compared mounted and handheld data from an in vivo porcine burn model of superficial and full thickness burns. The speckle contrast within the burn region (KBURN) of the mounted and handheld LSI data differed by <4 % when accounting for motion artifact using the FM, which is less than the speckle contrast difference between superficial and full thickness burns. Collectively, our results suggest the potential of handheld LSI with an FM as a suitable alternative to mounted LSI, especially in challenging clinical settings with space limitations such as the intensive care unit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.