SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2018
Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography to identify native valve infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple Imaging Modalities in the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Early and Very Early Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Infective Endocarditis: Imaging Challenges.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Transthoracic Echocardiography in Assessing Patients with Suspected Infective Endocarditis (TEASE): An Exploratory Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Spondylodiscitis and infective endocarditis: A retrospective cohort analysis of clinical outcomes, microbiological profiles, and mortality in 312 patients.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- Role of echocardiography in the diagnosis and clinical management of infective endocarditis.Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2024Review
- Infective Endocarditis byMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Review
- Contemporary Review of Multi-Modality Cardiac Imaging Evaluation of Infective Endocarditis.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) as an Extension of the Physical Examination in Patients with Bacteremia or Candidemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- An appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for the appropriate use of echocardiography for adult infective endocarditis-the timing and mode of assessment (TTE or TEE).BMC infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Article
- The Utility of Echocardiography in Pediatric Patients with Structurally Normal Hearts and Suspected Endocarditis.Pediatric cardiology · 2020Article
- Blood Cyst of the Mitral Valve Diagnosed in an Adult after Systemic Thrombolysis.Case reports in cardiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious and potentially life-threatening disease, and accurate diagnosis is essential. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the reference standard, in patients with suspected IE of the native valves. We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library searching for studies that enrolled adult patients with suspected native valves IE where data about both TTE and TEE could be extracted. We included 11 studies, for a total of 2209 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive likelihood ratios (LR) of TTE are 0.71 (95% CI 0.56-0.82), 0.80 (95% CI 0.58-0.92), 0.37 (95% CI 0.20-0.68) and 3.56 (95% CI 1.3-9.72), respectively. The subgroup analyses of the studies considering different cut-off levels show that the strict negative criteria (i.e., managing indeterminate results as positive) have the highest sensitivity and the lowest LR-. On the contrary, when managing indeterminate results as negative (standard criteria), the specificity and LR+ are the highest. We observed no differences between the studies performed with older and more recent technologies. In conclusion, our study results support the use of a negative TTE as a single rule-out test in patients with a low pre-test probability. In selected cases, the use of strict negative criteria might exclude IE in intermediate-risk patients, and a positive TTE might be considered as a single rule-in test with no need for TEE if TEE results would not change the patient's management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.