Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29546685›Full record

SynthesisInternal and emergency medicine2018

Diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography to identify native valve infective endocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mattia Bonzi, Giulia Cernuschi, Monica Solbiati, Giuliano Giusti, Nicola Montano, Elisa Ceriani

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Internal and emergency medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Infective Endocarditis byMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mattia BonziInternal Medicine Department, Ca' Granda Foundation IRCCS, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. mat.bonzi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2598-6331
Giulia CernuschiInternal Medicine Department, Ca' Granda Foundation IRCCS, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Monica SolbiatiInternal Medicine Department, Ca' Granda Foundation IRCCS, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giuliano GiustiDepartment of Paediatric Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Nicola MontanoInternal Medicine Department, Ca' Granda Foundation IRCCS, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Elisa CerianiInternal Medicine Department, Ca' Granda Foundation IRCCS, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITIRCCS Policlinico San Donato · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious and potentially life-threatening disease, and accurate diagnosis is essential. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) as the reference standard, in patients with suspected IE of the native valves. We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library searching for studies that enrolled adult patients with suspected native valves IE where data about both TTE and TEE could be extracted. We included 11 studies, for a total of 2209 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive likelihood ratios (LR) of TTE are 0.71 (95% CI 0.56-0.82), 0.80 (95% CI 0.58-0.92), 0.37 (95% CI 0.20-0.68) and 3.56 (95% CI 1.3-9.72), respectively. The subgroup analyses of the studies considering different cut-off levels show that the strict negative criteria (i.e., managing indeterminate results as positive) have the highest sensitivity and the lowest LR-. On the contrary, when managing indeterminate results as negative (standard criteria), the specificity and LR+ are the highest. We observed no differences between the studies performed with older and more recent technologies. In conclusion, our study results support the use of a negative TTE as a single rule-out test in patients with a low pre-test probability. In selected cases, the use of strict negative criteria might exclude IE in intermediate-risk patients, and a positive TTE might be considered as a single rule-in test with no need for TEE if TEE results would not change the patient's management.

Indexed as

Sensitivity and SpecificityEchocardiographyEndocarditisHumansDiagnostic accuracyEndocarditisMeta-analysisTransesophageal echocardiographyTransthoracic echocardiography

Identifiers

PMID29546685
OpenAlexW2793701666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.