Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29546652›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2018

Engagement of the motor system in position monitoring: reduced distractor suppression and effects of internal representation quality on motor kinematics.

Christina J Howard, Hayley Boulton, Emily Brown, Craig P A Arnold, Matthew K Belmonte, Suvobrata Mitra

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 98% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christina J HowardRoom 103, Taylor Building, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK. christina.howard@ntu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-8755-1109
Hayley BoultonRoom 103, Taylor Building, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK.
Emily BrownRoom 103, Taylor Building, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK.
Craig P A ArnoldRoom 103, Taylor Building, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK.
Matthew K BelmonteRoom 103, Taylor Building, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK.
Suvobrata MitraRoom 103, Taylor Building, Nottingham Trent University, 50 Shakespeare Street, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, UK.
Nottingham Trent University · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GB

Funding

Fundação Bial (PT) Fellowship #318/14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The position monitoring task is a measure of divided spatial attention in which participants track the changing positions of one or more objects, attempting to represent positions with as much precision as possible. Typically precision of representations declines with each target object added to participants' attention load. Since the motor system requires precise representations of changing target positions, we investigated whether position monitoring would be facilitated by increasing engagement of the motor system. Using motion capture, we recorded the positions of participants' index finger during pointing responses. Participants attempted to monitor the changing positions of between one and four target discs as they moved randomly around a large projected display. After a period of disc motion, all discs disappeared and participants were prompted to report the final position of one of the targets, either by mouse click or by pointing to the final perceived position on the screen. For mouse click responses, precision declined with attentional load. For pointing responses, precision declined only up to three targets and remained at the same level for four targets, suggesting obligatory attention to all four objects for loads above two targets. Kinematic profiles for pointing responses for highest and lowest loads showed greater motor adjustments during the point, demonstrating that, like external environmental task demands, the quality of internal representations affects motor kinematics. Specifically, these adjustments reflect the difficulty of both pointing to very precisely represented locations as well as keeping representations distinct from one another.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAttentionBiomechanical PhenomenaFemaleFingersHumansMaleMotion PerceptionPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceYoung AdultDivided attentionMotor controlMultiple object trackingPosition monitoringSpatial vision

Identifiers

PMID29546652
PMCPMC5937884
OpenAlexW2792517755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.