ArticleJournal of medical systems2018
Relevant Feature Selection from a Combination of Spectral-Temporal and Spatial Features for Classification of Motor Imagery EEG.
Article in Journal of medical systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parallel convolutional neural network and empirical mode decomposition for high accuracy in motor imagery EEG signal classification.PloS one · 2025Article
- Motor Imagery EEG Signal Classification Using Distinctive Feature Fusion with Adaptive Structural LASSO.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Adaptive Time-Frequency Segment Optimization for Motor Imagery Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The effects of layer-wise relevance propagation-based feature selection for EEG classification: a comparative study on multiple datasets.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Learning Optimal Time-Frequency-Spatial Features by the CiSSA-CSP Method for Motor Imagery EEG Classification.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Stockwell transform and semi-supervised feature selection from deep features for classification of BCI signals.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Hand Motor Imagery Classification Using Effective Connectivity and Hierarchical Machine Learning in EEG Signals.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2022Article
- Intentions Recognition of EEG Signals with High Arousal Degree for Complex Task.Journal of medical systems · 2020Article
- Improvement Motor Imagery EEG Classification Based on Regularized Linear Discriminant Analysis.Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
- Prediction of Hemodialysis Timing Based on LVW Feature Selection and Ensemble Learning.Journal of medical systems · 2018Article
- An Automatic Channel Selection Approach for ICA-Based Motor Imagery Brain Computer Interface.Journal of medical systems · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a novel algorithm (CVSTSCSP) for determining discriminative features from an optimal combination of temporal, spectral and spatial information for motor imagery brain computer interfaces. The proposed method involves four phases. In the first phase, EEG signal is segmented into overlapping time segments and bandpass filtered through frequency filter bank of variable size subbands. In the next phase, features are extracted from the segmented and filtered data using stationary common spatial pattern technique (SCSP) that can handle the non- stationarity and artifacts of EEG signal. The univariate feature selection method is used to obtain a relevant subset of features in the third phase. In the final phase, the classifier is used to build adecision model. In this paper, four univariate feature selection methods such as Euclidean distance, correlation, mutual information and Fisher discriminant ratio and two well-known classifiers (LDA and SVM) are investigated. The proposed method has been validated using the publicly available BCI competition IV dataset Ia and BCI Competition III dataset IVa. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms the existing methods in terms of classification error. A reduction of 76.98%, 75.65%, 73.90% and 72.21% in classification error over both datasets and both classifiers can be observed using the proposed CVSTSCSP method in comparison to CSP, SBCSP, FBCSP and CVSCSP respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29546648What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.