Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29546618›Full record

Trial reportLasers in medical science2018

LED session prior incremental step test enhance VO

Paulo V Mezzaroba, Dalton M Pessôa Filho, Alessandro M Zagatto, Fabiana Andrade Machado

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lasers in medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paulo V MezzarobaDepartment of Physical Education, State University of Maringá (UEM), Colombo Avenue, 5790, Maringá, PR, 87.020-900, Brazil.
Dalton M Pessôa FilhoDepartment of Physical Education, Paulista State University Julio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Bauro, Brazil.
Alessandro M ZagattoDepartment of Physical Education, Paulista State University Julio de Mesquita Filho (UNESP), Bauro, Brazil.
Fabiana Andrade MachadoDepartment of Physical Education, State University of Maringá (UEM), Colombo Avenue, 5790, Maringá, PR, 87.020-900, Brazil. famachado_uem@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of prior LED sessions on the responses of cardiorespiratory parameters during the running incremental step test. Twenty-six healthy, physically active, young men, aged between 20 and 30 years, took part in this study. Participants performed two incremental load tests after placebo (PLA) and light-emitting diode application (LED), and had their gas exchange, heart rate (HR), blood lactate, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) monitored during all tests. The PLA and LED conditions were compared using the dependent Student t test with significance set at 5%. The T test showed higher maximum oxygen uptake (VO

Indexed as

LightOxygen ConsumptionAdultExerciseExercise TestHumansMalePlacebosRunningYoung AdultPlacebosAerobic metabolismBlood lactateCardiorespiratoryErgogenicPhototherapy

Identifiers

PMID29546618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.