SynthesisTechniques in coloproctology2018
Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of robotic colorectal resections for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Techniques in coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Standardisation in robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Minimally Invasive Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgical Techniques.Journal of Crohn's & colitis · 2024Pooled it
- Should we encourage the use of robotic technologies in complicated diverticulitis? Results of systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2023Pooled it
- Single-center experience with robotic colorectal surgery for benign indications.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- How safe is teaching of highly specialized rectal surgery? A propensity score-matched 10-year cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026Article
- Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for IBD: a case-matched comparison during the learning curve.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Endoscopic recurrence of Crohn's disease following laparoscopic versus robotic ileocolic resection.Techniques in coloproctology · 2026Article
- Robotic surgery for Crohn's disease: multinational survey of colorectal surgeons.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Early Experience With Robotic Approaches to Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery: A Single-Center Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- [An update on surgical treatment options for inflammatory bowel disease].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Laparoscopic robotic-assisted ileo-caecal resection with intracorporeal anastomosis in children with Crohn disease: initial experience of a paediatric center and surgical feasibility.Pediatric surgery international · 2025Article
- Outcomes of robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease using the Medtronic Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgical platform: a single center experience.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- The future of robotic surgery for inflammatory bowel diseases.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Article
- Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for robotic ileocolic resection in Crohn's disease.Journal of robotic surgery · 2022Article
- Training for Minimally Invasive Surgery for IBD: A Current Need.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2021Review
- The Current Role of Robotics in Colorectal Surgery.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess outcome measures and cost-effectiveness of robotic colorectal resections in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease. The Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were reviewed, using the text "robotic(s)" AND ("inflammatory bowel disease" OR "Crohn's" OR "Ulcerative Colitis"). Two investigators screened abstracts for eligibility. All English language full-text articles were reviewed for specified outcomes. Data were presented in a summarised and aggregate form, since the lack of higher-level evidence studies precluded meta-analysis. Primary outcomes included mortality and postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included readmission rate, length of stay, conversion rate, procedure time, estimated blood loss and functional outcome. The tertiary outcome was cost-effectiveness. Eight studies (3 case-matched observational studies, 4 case series and 1 case report) met the inclusion criteria. There was no reported mortality. Overall, complications occurred in 81 patients (54%) including 30 (20%) Clavien-Dindo III-IV complications. Mean length of stay was 8.6 days. Eleven cases (7.3%) were converted to open. The mean robotic operating time was 99 min out of a mean total operating time of 298.6 min. Thirty-two patients (24.7%) were readmitted. Functional outcomes were comparable among robotic, laparoscopic and open approaches. Case-matched observational studies comparing robotic to laparoscopic surgery revealed a significantly longer procedure time; however, conversion, complication, length of stay and readmission rates were similar. The case-matched observational study comparing robotic to open surgery also revealed a longer procedure time and a higher readmission rate; postoperative complication rates and length of stay were similar. No studies compared cost-effectiveness between robotic and traditional approaches. Although robotic resections for inflammatory bowel disease are technically feasible, outcomes must be interpreted with caution due to low-quality studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.