Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29546469›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2018

Outcomes of primary anal sphincter repair after obstetric injury and evaluation of a novel three-choice assessment.

K Kuismanen, K Nieminen, K Karjalainen, K Lehto, J Uotila

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K KuismanenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland. kirsi.kuismanen@pshp.fi.
K NieminenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
K KarjalainenNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
K LehtoFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
J UotilaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study was to evaluate the subjective outcome of primary repair of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) at 6 months, the factors associated with the symptoms of anal incontinence (AI), and the role of a simple survey consisting in one question with three answer choices, combined with the Wexner incontinence score for the assessment of this patient population.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with third- or fourth-degree OASIS operated on between January 2007 and December 2013 inclusive at Tampere University Hospital, Finland. At 6 months, the patients were asked to report their Wexner's score as well as the three-choice assessment regarding AI symptoms. Based on this assessment, the patients were divided into three groups: those, asymptomatic, those with mild symptoms who did not want further treatment and those with severe symptoms who were willing to undergo further evaluation and treatment.

resultsThere were 325 patients (median age 30 years). A total of 310 patients answered the questionnaire. Of which, one hundred and ninety-eight (63.9%) patients were asymptomatic, 85 (27.4%) had mild AI, and 27 (8.7%) experienced severe symptoms. There was no statistical difference in the results between the two techniques used (overlapping vs. end-to-end), or the stage of specialization of the operating physician. Persistent symptoms were associated with instrumental vaginal delivery (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32-3.41), severity of the injury (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.20-2.25), and increased maternal age (OR 1.07, 95% CI 1.02-1.13). The correlation between the three-choice symptom evaluation and the Wexner score was good (Spearman's rho 0.82).

conclusionsAfter 6 months, severe symptoms after OASIS repair were present in 9% of women and were more frequent in older women, women with high-degree tears and after instrumental vaginal delivery. A three-choice assessment of AI symptoms correlated well with the Wexner score and might be useful to triage patients who need further evaluation.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAnal CanalDelivery, ObstetricExtraction, ObstetricalFecal IncontinenceFemaleHumansManometryMaternal AgePregnancyRetrospective StudiesSymptom AssessmentTrauma Severity IndicesAnal incontinenceAnal sphincterFecal incontinenceObstetric anal sphincter injury

Identifiers

PMID29546469
PMCPMC5862944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.