Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29546451›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2018

Patient experiences of receiving a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease.

A Schrag, S Modi, S Hotham, R Merritt, K Khan, L Graham, A on behalf of the European Parkinson’s Disease Association

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Improving Advance Care Planning for People with Parkinson's.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A SchragDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK. a.schrag@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9872-6680
S ModiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK.
S HothamCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
R MerrittCentre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
K KhanDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, UCL Institute of Neurology, Royal Free Campus, University College London, London, NW3 2PF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3836-2827
L GrahamEuropean Parkinson's Disease Association, Brussels, Belgium.
A on behalf of the European Parkinson’s Disease Association

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo report patients' own experiences of receiving a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD) and to identify factors influencing this experience.

methodsA survey by the European Parkinson's Disease Association in 11 European countries.

results1775 patients with an average age of 69.7 years participated of whom 54% were male. Those living in rural areas reported having waited longer to seek medical help (p < 0.05). A possible diagnosis of PD was made at the first appointment in a third of respondents. When the diagnosis was made, only 50% reported that the diagnosis was communicated sensitively. 38% of patients reported having been given enough time to ask questions and discuss concerns, but 29% did not. 98% of participants reported having been given information about PD at the time of diagnosis but 36% did not find the information given helpful. Patient satisfaction with the diagnostic consultation was positively associated with more sensitive delivery of diagnosis, the helpfulness and quantity of the information provided and time to ask questions (all p < 0.001). Where diagnosis was given by a specialist, participants reported greater perceived satisfaction with the diagnostic consultation, greater sensitivity of communicating the diagnosis, time to ask questions, provision and helpfulness of information, and earlier medication prescription (all p < 0.0001).

conclusionsThere is a need to improve how the diagnosis of PD is communicated to patients, the opportunity to ask questions soon after diagnosis, and the amount, timing and quality of life information provided, as this is associated with greater satisfaction with the diagnostic process.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationAgedEuropeFemaleHumansMaleParkinson DiseasePatient SatisfactionProfessional-Patient RelationsRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesTime-to-TreatmentUrban PopulationCommunicationDiagnosisExperienceParkinson’s diseasePatient-reported outcome

Identifiers

PMID29546451
PMCPMC5937885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.