Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29546336›Full record

ArticleLanguage, speech, and hearing services in schools2018

Effective Use of Auditory Bombardment as a Therapy Adjunct for Children With Developmental Language Disorders.

Elena Plante, Alexander Tucci, Katrina Nicholas, Genesis D Arizmendi, Rebecca Vance

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Input Parameters in an Expressive Vocabulary Treatment With Late Talkers.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Less Versus More: The Effect of Recast Length in Treatment of Grammatical Errors.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Translating Enhanced Conversational Recast to a Telepractice Setting.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2022
    Article
  16. Artificial Grammar Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Learning With and Without Feedback in Children With Developmental Language Disorder.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elena PlanteDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Alexander TucciDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Katrina NicholasDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Genesis D ArizmendiDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.
Rebecca VanceDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson.

Funding

Identification of treatment parameters that maximize language treatment efficacy for children. TALK Initiative supplement.R01DC015642 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MARY ALT, Elena M Plante · 2016 to 2026
$6.8M
Treatment delivery methods for children with SLIR21DC014203 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI PLANTE, ELENA M · 2014 to 2015
$377k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015642NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC014203
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Modeling of grammatical forms has been used in conjunction with conversational recast treatment in various forms. This study tests the relative effect of providing bombardment prior to or after recast treatment. Method: Twenty-eight children with developmental language disorder participated in daily conversational recast treatment for morpheme errors. This treatment was either preceded or followed by a brief period of intensive auditory bombardment. Generalization to untreated lexical contexts was measured throughout the treatment period to assess the degree of learning and how quickly the onset of measurable learning occurred. Results: There were no significant differences in elicited use of morphemes for the groups of children who received auditory bombardment before or after enhanced conversational recast treatment. However, there was a difference in the number of children who could be considered treatment responders versus nonresponders, favoring those who received auditory bombardment after recast treatment. Conclusion: A brief period of auditory bombardment is a relatively low cost addition to recast treatment methods, given how little time it takes. There is a small but measurable advantage to following recast treatment with a period of auditory bombardment. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.5960005.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolCombined Modality TherapyCommunicationFemaleHumansLanguage Development DisordersLanguage TherapyLearningLinguisticsMale

Identifiers

PMID29546336
PMCPMC6105133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.