ArticleAIMS public health2017
Comparison of Dietary Quality Assessment Using Food Frequency Questionnaire and 24-hour-recalls in Older Men and Women.
Article in AIMS public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03394963 (Scientific Foundations for Developing and Validating Food-based Dietary Guidelines and a Healthy Eating Index for Ethiopia), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Scientific Foundations for Developing and Validating Food-based Dietary Guidelines and a Healthy Eating Index for Ethiopia
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exposure to a Multilevel, Multicomponent Obesity Prevention Intervention (OPREVENT2) in Rural Native American Communities: Variability and Association with Change in Diet Quality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Development and Construct Validation of a Food-Based Diet Quality Score Using Image-Based Food Records.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Dietary Stilbenes May Mitigate Risk of Lung Cancer: Evidence from Two Prospective Cohort Studies in the UK and Japan.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mediterranean dietary pattern analysis combining two nutritional assessment tools in children aged 3 to 6 years in five European countries.European journal of nutrition · 2026Observational
- Design and usability of Abu Dhabi Food Intake24: a culturally adapted digital 24-hour dietary recall for the United Arab Emirates.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Plant-based dietary patterns and fasting insulin: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 2017-2018.BMC nutrition · 2023Article
- Cow's Milk Intake and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Korean Postmenopausal Women.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Vitamin D Intake and Factors Associated With Self-Reported Vitamin D Deficiency Among US Adults: A 2021 Cross-Sectional Study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2022Article
- Article
- Article
- Have We Taken Advantage of the Quarantine to Develop Healthy Habits? A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Spanish COVID-19 Situation by Gender.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Methodology for developing and evaluating food-based dietary guidelines and a Healthy Eating Index for Ethiopia: a study protocol.BMJ open · 2019Observational
- Impact of socio-demographic factors, lifestyle and health status on nutritional status among the elderly in Taiwan.Nutrition research and practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo examine the agreement in nutrient intake and alternative healthy eating indices (AHEI) between a self-administered Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) and 24-hour recall (24HR) measurements of diet by gender, among older adults. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis is a cross-sectional observational study of 105 men and 99 women aged 65 and older living in urban and rural neighborhoods in Worcester County, Massachusetts, USA. Participants were queried on diet using both FFQ and 24HR. The healthy eating classification was compared between the two instruments by gender.
resultsFor men, the mean ± SD of AHEI total score was 48.2 ± 12.3 based on FFQ versus 34.7 ± 10.2 based on 24HR. For women, the mean ± SD was 47.9 ± 10.1 based on FFQ versus 36.1 ± 10.0 based on 24HR. Using 32 as the cutoff (40% of maximum AHEI score), 9% of men and 7% of women were classified as eating unhealthy based on the FFQ, versus 47% of men and 38% of women based on 24HR. Compared to women, men had larger 24HR to FFQ discrepancies in the nuts and vegetable protein subscore and white/red meat ratio, and smaller discrepancy in alcohol beverages subscore.
conclusionAgreements between FFQ and 24HR-based measures of diet quality were roughly comparable between men and women, though slightly better for women than men. Compared to 24HR, the FFQ tended to underestimate the proportions of older men and women classified as eating unhealthy and misclassified more men than women. Such limitations should be considered when the FFQ is used to study healthy eating in older age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.