Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29546050›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

A Review of Ginseng Clinical Trials Registered in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform.

Yingchun He, Juan Yang, Yinghua Lv, Junchao Chen, Fang Yin, Jihan Huang, Qingshan Zheng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The Efficacy ofNutrients · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Ginseng and health outcomes: an umbrella review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Ginseng for erectile dysfunction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Ginsenoside RbChinese herbal medicines · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. A Brief Review on Medicinal Plants-At-Arms against COVID-19.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yingchun HeCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5735-8319
Juan YangCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yinghua LvCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Junchao ChenCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Fang YinCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jihan HuangCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2176-737X
Qingshan ZhengCenter for Drug Clinical Research, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6235-8137

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although ginseng has long been broadly used in clinical settings around the world, few clinical trials on ginseng have been conducted. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the characteristics of ginseng clinical trials registered in the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) as of December 2017 regarding their frequency, design, type of ginseng, dosage, duration, condition, funding sources, and publication status. A total of 134 ginseng clinical studies were registered from 2002 to 2017, of which 60.4% were completed and 23.1% are actively recruiting participants. A large number of trials were associated with aspects of high-quality trial design. Overall, 94% of the trials employed randomized allocation to study arms, 78.4% were double-blind studies using placebo as one of the control groups, and 71% were published as completed trials. Trials whose sample size was restricted to fewer than 100 participants accounted for 74.7% of the total. Of the primary funding sources for ginseng studies, 67.2% were nonindustry organizations. The ginseng clinical trials were heterogeneous with respect to ginseng species and variety, indications, dose, duration, and participant characteristics. Clearly, stricter and methodologically suitable studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of ginseng.

Indexed as

Complementary TherapiesClinical Trials as TopicHumansPanaxPlant ExtractsRegistriesWorld Health OrganizationPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID29546050
PMCPMC5818925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.