ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2018
Comparison of Two Toric IOL Calculation Methods.
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the accuracy of toric IOL power in cataract eyes with irregular astigmatism using two keratometry devices.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Predicting accuracy of spherical equivalent after cataract surgery using the online Zcalc calculator for toric IOLs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Mid-Term Effect of Preservative-Free Artificial Tears Containing Hyaluronic Acid on Dry Eye Incidence after Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Postoperative Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Trifocal and Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Patients with Different Biometric Characteristics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- The Preoperative Factors for the Undercorrection of Myopia in an Extend Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens: A Case-Control Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Clinical Results of a Monofocal Aspheric Bitoric Intraocular Lens with Plate Haptics in Hyperopic Eyes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- The refractive accuracy between topographic keratometry and biometric keratometry for extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens implantation.International journal of medical sciences · 2024Article
- Agreement of Total Keratometry and Posterior Keratometry Among IOLMaster 700, CASIA2, and Pentacam.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Comparison of Barrett Toric Calculations Using Measured and Predicted Posterior Corneal Astigmatism in Cataract Surgery Patients.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2022Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020Article
- Clinically relevant differences in the selection of toric intraocular lens power in normal eyes: preoperative measurement vs intraoperative aberrometry.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare two calculators for toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculation and to evaluate the prediction of refractive outcome.
methodsSixty-four eyes of forty-five patients underwent cataract surgery followed by implantation of a toric intraocular lens (Zeiss Torbi 709 M) calculated by a standard industry calculator using front keratometry values. Prediction error, median absolute error, and refractive astigmatism error were evaluated for the standard calculator. The predicted postoperative refraction and toric lens power values were evaluated and compared after postoperative recalculation using the Barrett calculator.
resultsWe observed a significant undercorrection in the spherical equivalent (0.19 D) by using a standard calculator (
conclusionConsideration of only corneal front keratometric values for toric lens calculation may lead to postoperative undercorrection of astigmatism. The prediction of postoperative refractive outcome can be improved by using appropriate methods of adjustment in order to take PCA into account.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.