ReviewInternational journal of biomaterials2018
Strain and Vibration in Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Review in International journal of biomaterials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Mathematical Model of Wound Healing Incorporating Strain-Induced MSC Differentiation.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Biomechanical research using advanced micro-nano devices: In-Vitro cell Characterization focus.Journal of advanced research · 2025Review
- Nanofibrous Scaffolds' Ability to Induce Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation for Soft Tissue Regenerative Applications.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Dynamic Stimulations with Bioengineered Extracellular Matrix-Mimicking Hydrogels for Mechano Cell Reprogramming and Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Review
- Rapid Prototypable Biomimetic Peristalsis Bioreactor Capable of Concurrent Shear and Multi-Axial Strain.Cells, tissues, organs · 2023Article
- Electromagnetic field exposure as a plausible approach to enhance the proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in clinically relevant scenarios.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2022Review
- Design, Fabrication, Testing and Simulation of a Rotary Double Comb Drives Actuated Microgripper.Micromachines · 2021Article
- Remote-Controlled 3D Porous Magnetic Interface toward High-Throughput Dynamic 3D Cell Culture.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Article
- Mechanism of Cyclic Tensile Stress in Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells.Calcified tissue international · 2021Article
- [Early stage mechanical adaptability and osteogenic differentiation of mouse bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cell under micro-vibration stimulation environment].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020Article
- Recovery of stem cell proliferation by low intensity vibration under simulated microgravity requires LINC complex.NPJ microgravity · 2019Article
- Toughening of Poly(L-lactide) with Blends of Poly(International journal of biomaterials · 2018Article
- The effect of low-magnitude, high-frequency vibration on poly(ethylene glycol)-microencapsulated mesenchymal stem cells.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent cells capable of differentiating into any mesenchymal tissue, including bone, cartilage, muscle, and fat. MSC differentiation can be influenced by a variety of stimuli, including environmental and mechanical stimulation, scaffold physical properties, or applied loads. Numerous studies have evaluated the effects of vibration or cyclic tensile strain on MSCs towards developing a mechanically based method of differentiation, but there is no consensus between studies and each investigation uses different culture conditions, which also influence MSC fate. Here we present an overview of the response of MSCs to vibration and cyclic tension, focusing on the effect of various culture conditions and strain or vibration parameters. Our review reveals that scaffold type (e.g., natural versus synthetic; 2D versus 3D) can influence cell response to vibration and strain to the same degree as loading parameters. Hence, in the efforts to use mechanical loading as a reliable method to differentiate cells, scaffold selection is as important as method of loading.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.