Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29545734›Full record

ArticleFood & nutrition research2018

Relative validity of a short food frequency questionnaire assessing adherence to the Norwegian dietary guidelines among colorectal cancer patients.

Hege Berg Henriksen, Monica Hauger Carlsen, Ingvild Paur, Sveinung Berntsen, Siv Kjølsrud Bøhn, Anne Juul Skjetne, Ane Sørlie Kværner, Christine Henriksen, Lene Frost Andersen, Sigbjørn Smeland and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food & nutrition research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01570010 (The Norwegian Dietary Guidelines and Colorectal Cancer Survival Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01570010 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

The Norwegian Dietary Guidelines and Colorectal Cancer Survival Study: A Food-based Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OsloRan2012 to 2040Enrolled503ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsNorwegian food based dietary guidelines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hege Berg HenriksenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Monica Hauger CarlsenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingvild PaurDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sveinung BerntsenFaculty of Health and Sports Science, University of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.
Siv Kjølsrud BøhnDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne Juul SkjetneDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ane Sørlie KværnerDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Christine HenriksenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lene Frost AndersenDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Sigbjørn SmelandInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Rune BlomhoffDepartment of Nutrition, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Agder · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Norwegian food-based dietary guidelines (FBDG) aim at reducing the risk of developing chronic diseases and promote overall health. We studied the effect of the Norwegian FBDG in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. There is a need for a time-efficient dietary assessment tool measuring adherence to these guidelines in patients treated for dietary dependent cancer, such as CRC patients.

objectiveTo evaluate a new short food frequency questionnaire (NORDIET-FFQ), developed to estimate adherence to the Norwegian FBDG among CRC patients.

designEighty-one CRC patients from both study groups in the Norwegian Dietary Guidelines and Colorectal Cancer Survival study, an ongoing dietary intervention, completed both the short 63-item NORDIET-FFQ and a 7-day weighed food record.

resultsThe NORDIET-FFQ was on group level able to estimate intakes of fruits, vegetables, unsalted nuts, fish, fatty fish, high fat dairy products, unprocessed meat, processed meat, red meat, water, sugar-rich beverages, alcoholic drinks, and sugar- and fat-rich foods. Ranking of individuals according to intake was good (

conclusionsThe NORDIET-FFQ showed good ability in to estimate intakes of plant-based foods, fish, dairy products, meat, and energy-dense foods; adequate ranking of individuals according to intake of most recommendations except for unprocessed meat, processed meat, and vegetables; and importantly a good ability to identify those patients in need of dietary counselling for foods that are known to modulate the risk of CRC.

trial registrationNational Institutes of Health ClinicalTrials.gov; Identifier: NCT01570010.

Indexed as

cancerdietary assessment tooldietary intakefood based dietary guidelinesvalidityweighed food records

Identifiers

PMID29545734
PMCPMC5846207
OpenAlexW2788254805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.