ArticleCirculation. Heart failure2018
Exploring New Cardiovascular Pathways: Are Soluble Guanylate Cyclase Stimulators the Right Direction?
Article in Circulation. Heart failure, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of Soluble Guanylate Cyclase on Cardiac, Vascular, and Renal Structure and Function: A Physiopathological Insight.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Pharmacological Therapy of HFrEF in 2025: Navigating New Advances and Old Unmet Needs in An Eternal Balance Between Progress and Perplexities.Cardiac failure review · 2025Review
- Clinical Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Profile of Vericiguat.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Review
- Vericiguat.Hospital pharmacy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29545396What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.