Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29545273›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Resonance with subthreshold oscillatory drive organizes activity and optimizes learning in neural networks.

James P Roach, Aleksandra Pidde, Eitan Katz, Jiaxing Wu, Nicolette Ognjanovski, Sara J Aton, Michal R Zochowski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adaptive behaviour and learning in slime moulds: the role of oscillations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Noisy Synaptic Conductance: Bug or a Feature?Trends in neurosciences · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

James P RoachNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; roachjp@umich.edu saton@umich.edu michalz@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1034-9615
Aleksandra PiddeDepartment of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Eitan KatzDepartment of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Jiaxing WuApplied Physics Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Nicolette OgnjanovskiDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Sara J AtonDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 roachjp@umich.edu saton@umich.edu michalz@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2921-0509
Michal R ZochowskiDepartment of Physics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; roachjp@umich.edu saton@umich.edu michalz@umich.edu.

Funding

Linking network activity and intracellular plasticity mechanisms during sleep-depDP2MH104119 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ATON, SARA J · 2013 to 2013
$2.3M
Understanding Functional Network Reorganization During the Information ProcessingR01EB018297 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ZOCHOWSKI, MICHAL R · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB018297NIMH NIH HHS DP2 MH104119
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network oscillations across and within brain areas are critical for learning and performance of memory tasks. While a large amount of work has focused on the generation of neural oscillations, their effect on neuronal populations' spiking activity and information encoding is less known. Here, we use computational modeling to demonstrate that a shift in resonance responses can interact with oscillating input to ensure that networks of neurons properly encode new information represented in external inputs to the weights of recurrent synaptic connections. Using a neuronal network model, we find that due to an input current-dependent shift in their resonance response, individual neurons in a network will arrange their phases of firing to represent varying strengths of their respective inputs. As networks encode information, neurons fire more synchronously, and this effect limits the extent to which further "learning" (in the form of changes in synaptic strength) can occur. We also demonstrate that sequential patterns of neuronal firing can be accurately stored in the network; these sequences are later reproduced without external input (in the context of subthreshold oscillations) in both the forward and reverse directions (as has been observed following learning in vivo). To test whether a similar mechanism could act in vivo, we show that periodic stimulation of hippocampal neurons coordinates network activity and functional connectivity in a frequency-dependent manner. We conclude that resonance with subthreshold oscillations provides a plausible network-level mechanism to accurately encode and retrieve information without overstrengthening connections between neurons.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalNeural Networks, ComputerAction PotentialsAnimalsComputer SimulationIon ChannelsLearningMiceNerve NetNeuronsRhodopsinIon ChannelsRhodopsinforward replayoscillationsreverse replaysequence learningspiking resonance

Identifiers

PMID29545273
PMCPMC5879670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.