Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29544972›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of arthroplasty2018

Evaluating Patients' Expectations From a Novel Patient-Centered Perspective Predicts Knee Arthroplasty Outcome.

Stephanie R Filbay, Andrew Judge, Antonella Delmestri, Nigel K Arden, COASt Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of arthroplasty, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. [Research progress in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie R FilbayArthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford UK.
Andrew JudgeDepartment of Translational Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, University of Bristol, School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol, UK; Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; MRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Antonella DelmestriNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford UK.
Nigel K ArdenArthritis Research UK Centre for Sport, Exercise and Osteoarthritis, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford UK.
COASt Study Group

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400491Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_U147585824Medical Research Council MC_U147585827Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOne-in-five patients are dissatisfied following knee arthroplasty and <50% have fulfilled expectations. The relationship between knee-arthroplasty expectations and surgical outcome remains unclear. PURPOSE: Are expectations regarding the impact of pain on postoperative life predictive of one-year outcome? Does the impact of pain on preoperative quality of life (QOL) influence this relationship?

methodsLongitudinal cohort of 1044 uni-compartmental (43%) or total knee-arthroplasty (57%) (UKA or TKA) patients, aged mean 69 ± 9 years. Preoperatively, patients reported the impact of pain on QOL and expected impact of pain on life one-year post-arthroplasty. One-year postoperative outcomes: non-return to desired activity, surgical dissatisfaction, not achieving Oxford Knee Score minimal important change (OKS <MIC). Logistic regression including covariates was performed for all patients and subgroups (better vs worse pre-operative pain-related QOL; UKA vs TKA).

resultsExpecting moderate-to-extreme pain (vs no pain) predicted non-return to activity (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 2.3 [1.3, 4.1]), dissatisfaction (4.0 [1.7, 9.3]), OKS <MIC (3.1 [1.5, 6.3]). Expecting mild pain (vs no pain) predicted worse outcomes for patients with better preoperative pain-related QOL (non-return to activity: 2.7 [1.5, 4.8], OKS <MIC: 2.5 [1.1, 5.5]). Expecting moderate-to-extreme pain (vs. no pain) predicted worse outcomes for patients with worse preoperative pain-related QOL (non-return to activity: 2.4 [1.1, 5.5], dissatisfaction: 5.0 [1.7, 14.8], OKS <MIC: 3.4 [1.4, 8.6]). The odds of a poor outcome in people with worse expectations was higher for UKA patients.

conclusionsExpecting a worse outcome predicted surgical dissatisfaction, less clinical improvement and non-return to desired activity. Patients expecting a more optimistic outcome relative to preoperative status achieved better surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

OptimismPatient-Centered CarePatient SatisfactionQuality of LifeAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedMotivationOsteoarthritis, KneePainPain Measurementoptimismpainpatient-reported outcomesquality of lifesatisfaction

Identifiers

PMID29544972
PMCPMC6005343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.