Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29544866›Full record

ArticleBehavioural processes2018

Durability and generalizability of time-based intervention effects on impulsive choice in rats.

Carrie Bailey, Jennifer R Peterson, Aaron Schnegelsiepen, Sarah L Stuebing, Kimberly Kirkpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural processes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Role of the Serotonergic System in Time Perception: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Using sign tracking to experimentally increase self-control in rats.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reducing impulsive choice: VI. Delay-exposure training reduces aversion to delay-signaling stimuli.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Cognitive and behavioral training interventions to promote self-control.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carrie BaileyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, United States. Electronic address: cturpen@ksu.edu.
Jennifer R PetersonDepartment of Psychology, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, 99775, United States.
Aaron SchnegelsiepenDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, United States.
Sarah L StuebingDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, United States.
Kimberly KirkpatrickDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, United States.

Funding

Timing, Reward Processing and choiceR01MH085739 · NIMH · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, TRAVIS R, VONDER HAAR, COLE · 2010 to 2025
$4.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impulsive choice involves choosing a smaller-sooner (SS) reward over a larger-later (LL) reward. Due to the importance of timing processes in impulsive choice, time-based interventions have been developed to decrease impulsive choice. The present set of experiments assessed the durability and generalizability of time-based interventions. Experiment 1 assessed fixed interval (FI) or variable interval (VI) intervention efficacy over 9 months. The FI intervention decreased impulsive choice, and this effect persisted over time, but the VI intervention effects were only apparent when tested immediately after the intervention. Experiment 2 examined the generalizability of the FI and VI interventions on choice tasks manipulating the SS delay, LL delay, or LL magnitude. The FI intervention decreased sensitivity to delay, promoting LL choices in both delay tasks, but the VI intervention only altered choices when manipulating the SS delay. Experiment 3 further examined the FI intervention effects on tasks that manipulated the LL delay or magnitude immediately following the intervention. The intervention decreased sensitivity to both delay and magnitude. The experiments indicate that the FI intervention is effective at decreasing impulsive choice behavior for an extended period across changing delays and magnitudes, suggesting a relatively broad effect on choice behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorImpulsive BehaviorLearningMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRewardTime FactorsDelay discountingImpulsive choiceInterventionRatTiming

Identifiers

PMID29544866
PMCPMC5966323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.