Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29544547›Full record

ArticleJournal of hematology & oncology2018

Long-term effects of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy on bone marrow fibrosis in patients with myelofibrosis.

Hans Michael Kvasnicka, Jürgen Thiele, Carlos E Bueso-Ramos, William Sun, Jorge Cortes, Hagop M Kantarjian, Srdan Verstovsek

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hematology & oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00509899 (A Phase 1/2, Open-Label Study of the JAK2 Inhibitor INCB018424 Administered Orally to Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00509899 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 1/2, Open-Label Study of the JAK2 Inhibitor INCB018424 Administered Orally to Patients With Primary Myelofibrosis (PMF) and Post Polycythemia Vera/Essential Thrombocythemia Myelofibrosis (Post-PV/ET)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIncyte CorporationRan2007 to 2017Enrolled154ConditionsMyelofibrosis, Polycythemia Vera, ThrombocytosisArmsRuxolitinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Myelofibrosis: Treatment Options After Ruxolitinib Failure.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hans Michael KvasnickaSenckenberg Institute of Pathology, University of Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590, Frankfurt, Germany. hans-michael.kvasnicka@kgu.de.ORCID 0000-0002-5450-4840
Jürgen ThieleUniversity of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Carlos E Bueso-RamosDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
William SunIncyte Corporation, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Jorge CortesDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Hagop M KantarjianDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Srdan VerstovsekDepartment of Leukemia, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEIncyte (United States) · USUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMyelofibrosis (MF) is a life-shortening complication of myeloproliferative neoplasms associated with ineffective hematopoiesis, splenomegaly, and progressive bone marrow (BM) fibrosis. The oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has been shown to improve splenomegaly, symptom burden, and overall survival in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF compared with placebo or best available therapy (BAT).

methodsThe effects of ruxolitinib therapy for up to 66 months on BM morphology in 68 patients with advanced MF with variable BM fibrosis grade were compared with those in 192 matching patients treated with BAT. Available trephine biopsies underwent independent, blinded review by three hematopathologists for consensus-based adjudication of grades for reticulin fibrosis, collagen deposition, and osteosclerosis.

resultsRuxolitinib treatment versus BAT was associated with greater odds of BM fibrosis improvement or stabilization and decreased odds of BM fibrosis worsening based on changes from baseline in reticulin fibrosis grade. Generally, these changes were accompanied by a sustained higher level of individual spleen size reduction and regression of leukoerythroblastosis. Patients with more advanced baseline fibrosis showed lower spleen size response.

conclusionsThe finding that long-term ruxolitinib therapy may reverse or markedly delay BM fibrosis progression in advanced MF suggests that sustained JAK inhibition may be disease-modifying.

trial registrationINCB18424-251, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00509899 .

Indexed as

AgedFemaleHumansJanus KinasesMaleNitrilesPrimary MyelofibrosisPyrazolesPyrimidinesTreatment OutcomeJanus KinasesNitrilesPyrazolesPyrimidinesruxolitinibBone marrow fibrosisHydroxyureaMyelofibrosisRuxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID29544547
PMCPMC5856218
OpenAlexW2795241918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.