Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29544545›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2018

Assessment of interactions of efavirenz solid drug nanoparticles with human immunological and haematological systems.

Neill J Liptrott, Marco Giardiello, Tom O McDonald, Steve P Rannard, Andrew Owen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Neill J LiptrottDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, The University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Block H, First Floor, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK. Neill.liptrott@liverpool.ac.uk.
Marco GiardielloDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Tom O McDonaldDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Steve P RannardDepartment of Chemistry, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew OwenDepartment of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, The University of Liverpool, 70 Pembroke Place, Block H, First Floor, Liverpool, L69 3GF, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent work has developed solid drug nanoparticles (SDNs) of efavirenz that have been demonstrated, preclinically, improved oral bioavailability and the potential to enable up to a 50% dose reduction, and is currently being studied in a healthy volunteer clinical trial. Other SDN formulations are being studied for parenteral administration, either as intramuscular long-acting formulations, or for direct administration intravenously. The interaction of nanoparticles with the immunological and haematological systems can be a major barrier to successful translation but has been understudied for SDN formulations. Here we have conducted a preclinical evaluation of efavirenz SDN to assess their potential interaction with these systems. Platelet aggregation and activation, plasma coagulation, haemolysis, complement activation, T cell functionality and phenotype, monocyte derived macrophage functionality, and NK cell function were assessed in primary healthy volunteer samples treated with either aqueous efavirenz or efavirenz SDN.

resultsEfavirenz SDNs were shown not to interfere with any of the systems studied in terms of immunostimulation nor immunosuppression. Although efavirenz aqueous solution was shown to cause significant haemolysis ex vivo, efavirenz SDNs did not. No other interaction with haematological systems was observed. Efavirenz SDNs have been demonstrated to be immunologically and haematologically inert in the utilised assays.

conclusionsTaken collectively, along with the recent observation that lopinavir SDN formulations did not impact immunological responses, these data indicate that this type of nanoformulation does not elicit immunological consequences seen with other types of nanomaterial. The methodologies presented here provide a framework for pre-emptive preclinical characterisation of nanoparticle safety.

Indexed as

Drug CarriersAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCell Line, TumorClinical Trials as TopicComplement ActivationCyclopropanesDrug CompoundingDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEpithelial CellsErythrocytesHemolysisHumansKiller Cells, NaturalLimulus TestAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesDrug CarriersefavirenzLipopolysaccharidesPolyvinyl AlcoholtocophersolanVitamin EAntiretroviralBiocompatibilityHaematotoxicityHIVImmunotoxicity

Identifiers

PMID29544545
PMCPMC5853089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.