ArticleBiomaterials2018
Competition of charge-mediated and specific binding by peptide-tagged cationic liposome-DNA nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo.
Article in Biomaterials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
40 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision nanomedicine for pulmonary diseases: from molecular targeting to clinical translation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Physiological Considerations and Delivery Strategies for Targeting Tumors Through Intraperitoneal Delivery.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Review
- Nanomedicine in Cancer Therapeutics: Current Perspectives from Bench to Bedside.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Brief Comparison of the Efficacy of Cationic and Anionic Liposomes as Nonviral Delivery Systems.ACS omega · 2024Review
- The treatment landscape of triple-negative breast cancer.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2024Review
- Lipids with negative spontaneous curvature decrease the solubility of the cancer drug paclitaxel in liposomes.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2023Article
- Lipids with negative spontaneous curvature decrease the solubility of the cancer drug paclitaxel in liposomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Lipid nanoparticle topology regulates endosomal escape and delivery of RNA to the cytoplasm.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Targeting of Tomato Bushy Stunt Virus with a Genetically Fused C-End Rule Peptide.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- In Silico and In Vivo Studies of a Tumor-Penetrating and Interfering Peptide with Antitumoral Effect on Xenograft Models of Breast Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- A Review of Different Types of Liposomes and Their Advancements as a Form of Gene Therapy Treatment for Breast Cancer.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Lipid-engineered nanotherapeutics for cancer management.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Design, synthesis and analysis of charged RGD derivatives.Bioinformation · 2023Article
- Paclitaxel-Loaded Cationic Fluid Lipid Nanodiscs and Liposomes with Brush-Conformation PEG Chains Penetrate Breast Tumors and Trigger Caspase-3 Activation.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022Article
- Lipid-based nanoparticles for treatment of cancer.Heliyon · 2022Review
- Targeted Liposomes: A Nonviral Gene Delivery System for Cancer Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Combined Self-Assembled iRGD Polymersomes for Effective Targeted siRNA Anti-Tumor Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Article
- Homing Peptide-Based Targeting of Tenascin-C and Fibronectin in Endometriosis.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Bi-Functional Peptides as a New Therapeutic Tool for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Cationic Liposomes as Vectors for Nucleic Acid and Hydrophobic Drug Therapeutics.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Cationic liposome-nucleic acid (CL-NA) complexes, which form spontaneously, are a highly modular gene delivery system. These complexes can be sterically stabilized via PEGylation [PEG: poly (ethylene glycol)] into nanoparticles (NPs) and targeted to specific tissues and cell types via the conjugation of an affinity ligand. However, there are currently no guidelines on how to effectively navigate the large space of compositional parameters that modulate the specific and nonspecific binding interactions of peptide-targeted NPs with cells. Such guidelines are desirable to accelerate the optimization of formulations with novel peptides. Using PEG-lipids functionalized with a library of prototypical tumor-homing peptides, we varied the peptide density and other parameters (binding motif, peptide charge, CL/DNA charge ratio) to study their effect on the binding and uptake of the corresponding NPs. We used flow cytometry to quantitatively assess binding as well as internalization of NPs by cultured cancer cells. Surprisingly, full peptide coverage resulted in less binding and internalization than intermediate coverage, with the optimum coverage varying between cell lines. In, addition, our data revealed that great care must be taken to prevent nonspecific electrostatic interactions from interfering with the desired specific binding and internalization. Importantly, such considerations must take into account the charge of the peptide ligand as well as the membrane charge density and the CL/DNA charge ratio. To test our guidelines, we evaluated the in vivo tumor selectivity of selected NP formulations in a mouse model of peritoneally disseminated human gastric cancer. Intraperitoneally administered peptide-tagged CL-DNA NPs showed tumor binding, minimal accumulation in healthy control tissues, and preferential penetration of smaller tumor nodules, a highly clinically relevant target known to drive recurrence of the peritoneal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.