Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29543900›Full record

ArticlePLoS pathogens2018

The root-knot nematode effector MiPFN3 disrupts plant actin filaments and promotes parasitism.

Natthanon Leelarasamee, Lei Zhang, Cynthia Gleason

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS pathogens, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Combating Root-Knot Nematodes (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Cytoskeleton in Plant Immunity: Dynamics, Regulation, and Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  8. Fungal Effectoromics: A World in Constant Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Comparative Analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Analyses of the Root-Knot Nematode (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Battlefield Cytoskeleton: Turning the Tide on Plant Immunity.Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natthanon LeelarasameeDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology and Physiology, Albrecht von Haller Institute, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5308-2500
Lei ZhangDepartment of Plant Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States of America.
Cynthia GleasonDepartment of Plant Molecular Biology and Physiology, Albrecht von Haller Institute, Georg August University, Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8365-9131
Washington State University · USUniversity of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Root-knot nematodes secrete effectors that manipulate their host plant cells so that the nematode can successfully establish feeding sites and complete its lifecycle. The root-knot nematode feeding structures, their "giant cells," undergo extensive cytoskeletal remodeling. Previous cytological studies have shown the cytoplasmic actin within the feeding sites looks diffuse. In an effort to study root-knot nematode effectors that are involved in giant cell organogenesis, we have identified a nematode effector called MiPFN3 (Meloidogyne incognita Profilin 3). MiPFN3 is transcriptionally up-regulated in the juvenile stage of the nematode. In situ hybridization experiments showed that MiPFN3 transcribed in the nematode subventral glands, where it can be secreted by the nematode stylet into the plant. Moreover, Arabidopsis plants that heterologously expressed MiPFN3 were more susceptible to root-knot nematodes, indicating that MiPFN3 promotes nematode parasitism. Since profilin proteins can bind and sequester actin monomers, we investigated the function of MiPFN3 in relation to actin. Our results show that MiPFN3 suppressed the aberrant plant growth phenotype caused by the misexpression of reproductive actin (AtACT1) in transgenic plants. In addition, it disrupted actin polymerization in an in vitro assay, and it reduced the filamentous actin network when expressed in Arabidopsis protoplasts. Over a decade ago, cytological studies showed that the cytoplasmic actin within nematode giant cells looked fragmented. Here we provide the first evidence that the nematode is secreting an effector that has significant, direct effects on the plant's actin cytoskeleton.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsArabidopsisGiant CellsHelminth ProteinsHost-Parasite InteractionsPlant DiseasesPlant RootsPlants, Genetically ModifiedSecernentea InfectionsTylenchoideaHelminth Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29543900
PMCPMC5871015
OpenAlexW2793656889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.